Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeCourseworkPsychology
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

Frontal Cortex (Coursework Sample)

Instructions:
Directions : Over the course of the last couple of lectures we discussed some of the major subcortical and cortical structures of the brain. This exercise is designed for you to learn more about one particular structure of your choosing. While you must select an area of the brain, you do not have to necessarily stick to the regions only discussed in class. Once you've decided on your brain area, answer the following questions. Sometimes it helps to understand the general function of an area by learning about its major inputs and outputs. Go ahead and try and locate some information about incoming and outgoing pathways associated with your area. As with the first assignment, you might find using the PsycINFO database in our library to be of assistance. Also, you are permitted to use resources such as “Google Books” and “Google Scholar” in your search for this assignment if you hit a roadblock from using our textbook and PsycINFO searches. Outline the major functions associated with your area. Then, locate a single article that investigates the relationship between this function and your chosen brain region. Include a synopsis of the article including: why they did it how they did it who did they study what types of measures did they use and what did they find. Provide the reference for your source Explain one disorder or disease associated with your selected brain region. What are the major symptoms associated with that condition? Finally, imagine that you were able to put that area in your own brain to sleep for 24 hours. What would your day be like? What aspects of your regular routine would be interrupted? How and why? Make sure to give at least a couple concrete examples. source..
Content:
Frontal Cortex Student Name Institutional Affiliation Frontal Cortex The frontal cortex (FC) is the section that lies at the front of the brain. The FC is divided into sub-regions, which vary depending on the source. Some of the boundaries include ventromedial, ventrolateral, dorsolateral, dorsomedial, and orbitofrontal. FC plays a vital role in motivation, attention, memory, and other essential daily tasks. The FC is the central part of the brain located near the front head section under the anterior skull bones close to the forehead. Moreover, it is the last part of the brain to evolve. The frontal lobe is sectioned into three critical areas districted by their function and anatomy. The size and complexity of the FC vary in different mammal species. Nevertheless, the frontal lobe has been concerned with scheduling compound cognitive performances, decision making, personality expression, and controlling social behavior. The paper focuses on the WM in the FC. Why They Did It The researchers wanted to undertake a study that would show that the FC participates in various higher cognitive functions. The authors wanted to comprehend the concept of working memory (WM) and how it is used to understand FC’s role. Neurophysiological materials have exposed that stimulus-indiscriminate delay-time action is a neutral associate of the mechanism for momentarily preserving material in the WM. Moreover, the master constituent of Baddeley’s functioning classical is believed to be the central role of the frontal context. More evidence shows that FC achieves the functions of the central executive (Funahashi, 2017). Dual-task paradigm interference effects have been used to examine neutral contrivances of memory control. They show that the impacts are caused by the loaded and competitive conscription of coinciding neural populations in the FC. Two simultaneous tasks and the dispensation capability of a sole neutral are restricted to a specific level. However, the charges can be reallocated or malleably assigned according to their needs hence enhancing behavioral performance when a single task allocation increases. How They Did It The authors employed Baddeley’s WM classical to explain various functions of cognitive functions. Baddeley and Logie described the WM as an instrument that helped humans understand and psychologically epitomize their direct setting, remember information on their instant past familiarities, sustain novel knowledge, relate, formulate and act on current objectives. Moreover, the authors employed Baddeley’s idea since it was more influential, stating that WM is based on the master component, the central executive, and the visual-spatial sketchpad and phonological loop (Funahashi, 2017). The sketchpad is a temporary system for storing special and visual image information, while the phonological loop focuses on language comprehension and speech perception. WM was tested using rhesus monkeys with two-sided frontal lacerations that showed long-lasting and severe damage to the delayed response routine. The deferred response routine is one of the most critical behavioral tasks for examining FC function experiments using animals. WM has become an essential concept in comprehending and interpreting FC functions in animals and humans (Funahashi, 2017). Additionally, delayed-response deficits are a result of short-term storage mechanism impairment of certain information. Therefore, WM is the critical indication for understanding FC purposes backed up by many human and animal neuroimaging studies. Who Did They Study The study was performed by Shintaro Funahashi from Kyoto University Kokoro research centre and Sven Kroener, who is an associate professor for neuroscience and academic editor in Dallas. Grants-in-Aid backed up the study for scientific research. What Types of Measures Did They Use The authors used various research from various authors from PubMed, Google Scholar, and CrossRef, which are online materials, to develop all the research information. Moreover, he used different keywords like delay-period activity, frontal cortex, monkey, working memory, central executive, meta-memory, and dual-task, to get the platforms' sources. The researchers did not employ significant measures like interviews and surveys; instead, the author compared different relatable information to develop original ideas about the research. Moreover, he also chose information that was directly relatable to the research topic to offer extensive research. What Did They Find The authors found that the WM entails neutral processes for information manipulation and maintenance of short-term active memory. Additionally, executive roles are operated by the FC are deliberated to be an impartial process for information manipulation would be essential than sustaining information. Exploring neutral actions using a meta-memory or dual-task paradigm shows some vital functions connected to the central executive that has been evidenced. Delay-period action is observed in the FC and another brain (Funahashi, 2017). The information signified by the delay-period activity might vary in diverse brain parts even if the actions show a similar temporal outline. Provide the Reference for Your Source Funahashi, S. (2017). WM in the preFC. Brain sciences, 7(5), 49. Disorder of the FC The primary disorder is frontotemporal dementia, which is a group of diseases that damage the FC of the brain. Frontotemporal conditions result from damaged neurons in brain parts, including the temporal and frontal lobes (Olney, Spina & Miller, 2017). Neurons in the lobes die, making the cortex atrophy and shrink, thus damaging and leading to behavioral and thinking difficulties. Some of the symptoms include abnormal behaviors, emotional problems like mood swings, trouble in communication. Individuals show signs of dementia through having symptoms of memory, thinking, and information retaining impairments. Moreover, dementia ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!