Final Discussion: Benchmarking (Essay Sample)

Benchmarking
Name
Institution
Date
Introduction
In principle, Parkland Memorial Hospital has been among Dallas’ worst performing hospitals in terms of patient safety for a long period (Mcneill, 2011). Significantly, it is because of this that need has arisen to benchmark the hospital’s security and improve this weakness on its part. In essence, with the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center being ranked as one of the best health care facility in the United States, at once it became the best facility to benchmark against in terms of patient safety (U.S.News & WORLD REPORT, 2015).
In essence, surgical accidents have been at a high rate at Parkland and St. Paul. Moreover, federal health regulators gave poor performance points to the health care facility (Garson & Engelhard, 2011). Significantly, it is important to try and find out what the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center does to ensure it meets the needed quality level of patient security in terms of minimal surgical accidents. Furthermore, with the reports of several safety inspections carried out by the government indicating that patients had been harmed in late September.
Significantly, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center has an excellent record on patient security in terms of surgical accidents being very minimal if any happen. Therefore, there is need to benchmark against the health care facility’s medical team’s qualification level. In essence, most surgical accidents occur due to the hospital staff’s incompetence. Moreover, analyzing the surgeons’ work ethics in terms of urgency and ability to perform under pressure gives the benchmarking health care facility a chance to improve the quality of its staff.
Concurrently, comparing Parkland’s surgical staff qualification to that of University of Texas’ staff one would quickly note the difference in quality. Principally, Parkland’s surgery room lacks some critical equipment that forces medical practitioners to work in a straining environment. However, the University of Texas which has world class surgery room equipped with modern equipment that surgeons find it easy to work and give their best for the environment is conducive unlike Parkland's (Carr, 2014).
Conclusion
In essence, the two health care facilities are in the same industry; hence, one can be able to compare the two. Significantly, the differences between the two are the quality of services, resources, and staff qualification. In principle, such distinctions are the sole reason why one health care facility is performing poorly lies on how well it manages its re...