Biometrics Privacy (Essay Sample)

Biometrics Privacy
Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date
Biometric privacy rules apply to any data from body measurements or human traits. Biometric data includes palm prints, retina scanning, face detection, typing cadence, voice patterns, electronic signatures, genetic information scans, and behavioral tendencies such as internet search histories. While biometric authentication is effective, civil libertarians fear it would compromise individual privacy (Vats, & Kaur, 2016). Personal information may be obtained rapidly, even without authorization, which is a cause for worry. The federal government's power to employ biometrics for monitoring presents the biggest danger to privacy. As face recognition software technologies advance and cameras grow increasingly capable of recording more comprehensive information, secret identities and monitoring may become the norm.
Biometrics, like so many other advances, has the potential to compromise privacy. It is important to note, however, that biometrics are not completely incompatible with privacy; the amount to which biometrics enhance or impinge on people's privacy depends on how systems are designed and utilized. The following are some privacy problems that may develop due to the use of biometrics.
Unsavory gathering
Another threat to people's privacy is the clandestine or passive biometric data collection without their consent, participation, or awareness. Facial biometric information, for example, may be obtained from photographs that individuals are unaware are being taken, and latent palm prints can be extracted to capture biometric information long after they have come into contact with a hard substance.
When biometric data is collected sneakily or unobtrusively, people often cannot give proper permission or control what biometric data is collected or how it is used (Meng et al, 2014). Even when people help with a biometric system, like when it is used as a safety measure to check who works at a company, they often cannot give proper permission. Biometrics also throws the idea of consent into question. Consent for information confidentiality has generally been based on a behavioral viewpoint, which indicates that the person can make choices about their private details, such as what information was collected, when it was obtained, and how to utilize it.
Depending on the characteristics and how the information is kept, some biometric authentication may give more information about a person than what the biometric was originally used for. For example, a raw picture of a facial biometric might disclose confidential health data that a person did not want to offer guidance and did not conform to the collecting.
Biometrics have been tainted.
Another limitation of biometric systems is that biometric traits cannot be redistributed or canceled except for passcodes or ID tokens. When a person's thumbprint or another neurobiological biometric is compromised, altering that function may be very difficult, if not impossible. This may be a concern if that biometric trait is utilized for future verification.
Encroachment of a function
Gathering information for a purpose different than the one for which it was acquired is an example of a function distortion. This becomes a concern when the individual is not told of the additional usage while providing their information. For example, an org