Technology: Computer forensic (Essay Sample)

Name
Professor
Course
Date
Part A
Android users are drastically at risk-like users on the entire mobile platforms that are links to malware and phishing sites. Moreover, android Market delivers a variety of virus scanners (Phillips & Steuart, pp 112-189). Modern study from AV-Test depicts that free scanners unreliable, nevertheless, they give decent grades to paid products that mainly encompasses F-Secure’s Mobile Security and corresponding Kaspersky Mobile Security.
Apple and Google have taken control their application stores. Android’s open application store model that are deficiency of code signing and an application review process of Apple makes it easier to attackers to distribute their malware.
Part B
Fourth Amendment offers protection for the contents of electronic communications thus maintaining privacy concern inherent in the nature of computers. Thus, warrant normally defines the measures to direct the subsequent search of the computer. Moreover, it also restricts the scope of a search of a computer that contains intermingled documents.

Suspect’s cell phone normally contain massive information that suspect’s information. Since the phones possess massive information police ought to get warrant prior to accessing them. Nevertheless, exception to the underlying warrant requirement leaves the avenue of decision to the police officer.
Limited search does not require police to have search warrant. Conversely, thorough search require the police to search warrant in order to undertake search in both suspect’s cell phone and corresponding suspect’s computer.
d.)
Matter of urgency is normally utilized by police to reserve the right to search individual’s phone devoid of having a warrant.
Part C
Question 1
Ziegler suppresses the underlying evidence by obtaining the court order that stipulated that Ziegler had an empirically judicious expectation of the existing privacy within those spaces. Moreover, Ziegler’s expectation of privacy within his office was extremely realistic on the underlying facts of the case. (Phillips & Steuart, pp 112-189) The master key which is the existence was not unavoidably defeat a reasonable of the privacy within the office granted over the personal utilization. Since Ziegler possessed reasonable expectation of the privacy within his office, any search of the prevailing space and the corresponding items situated therein ought to comply with the existing Fourth Amendment.
Question 2
The government was granted...