Ethical Revaltivism (Essay Sample)

Ethical Relativism
Name
Institution
Date
Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism is an assumption that determines what a society or culture says is true. Whether Individual or societal ethical Relativism, the determinants of both can either be out of their own ethical codes-away from professional standards of beliefs, communal rules, and faith. For example, ethical concerns normally pertain to a particular group surroundings such as ethical issues in management or banking. This diversion in ethics and morals serves to separate ethics into dickens perception known as individual and societal ethics. This implies that moral standards are not widespread, but are reliant upon a certain cultural or social background. Therefore, what morality needs is comparative to society.
I agree with Albert Carr’s opinion that business should be practiced like a game. He creates an opinion which many individuals in and out of the business world deem appalling. The reason for this ethical infuriation and repulsion is based in the mystification individuals make among the principles of private life and the principles of business. The fact, that a business, as practiced by persons as well as a corporation, has the remote disposition of a game – a game that requires both exceptional stratagem and an understanding of its unique principles. Once the person enters into a business state of affairs, one is therefore, essential in a game situation and achievement or disappointments depends mostly on one’s capability, no matter what one’s position in the company, to participate the game in the right way.
For Carr, these two features are dissimilar and detached from each other, and to look forward to the ethics of our personal lives to decree over our business lives is bad business.
He disputes that once businessmen are in their work zone they stop to be private inhabitants and in its place become game dramatis personae that are steered by a dissimilar deposition of moral standards. According to Carr, business peoples all, at one time or another, feel the pressure to misinform. They are obliged, in the wellbeing of their business, to carry out some form of dishonesty when engaged in consultation with clientele. This dishonesty by watchful misstatements, disguise of facts or overstatement is taken on in the quest to convince others to concur with them. Concurrence, of course, entails a host of remunerations for either the person or business or for both.
According to Carr, if a businessman declines to take on in these acts of dishonesty, then he is disregarding opportunities tolerable under the rules of the game and efficiently setting his business at a grave disadvantage. Therefore, to do without these individual ethical responsibilities and doubts about dishonesty and to realize the efficacy of the "sham" as a justifiable instrument within the game of business engrosses an acknowledgment by the businessman that in deceiving he will not misplace self-worth or become psychologically distressed.
What this mean is that if the businessman wants to achieve a harmonious unity between his personal integrity and high standards of honesty, then he must believe that his acts of dishonesty are ethically acceptable. Carr position is criticized by William Shaw who states that he is protecting some sort of moral relativism as well as splitting business from principles, he misrepresent both business and ethics.
He also adds that Carr inaccurately treats the regulations of everyday business goings-on as separate from regulations of everyday principles
Rules are vital to the accomplishment of a business. It oversees employees’ conduct and standards great importance. A Business should be permitted to play by its individual set of laws because in keeping with its strict tasks each business endeavors to uphold the utmost standard of moral code. Meticulous businesses are one that occasionally step back and observe whether it is responsible to the environment, economy, and society with which it deals frequently. The test of lack of restrictions from preferential treatment is the ability to uphold good successful associations with all parties to a disagreement. This is realized through ensuring that its employees share that objective. Each staff member should adhere to the rules watchfully and reflect on different ways of applying the rules to their duties.
The business should also recognize that employees should be open to do innovative, civic and individual work and to receive extra earnings in ways separate from their work in the business. Conflicts of interest, real or apparent, may arise in many areas. The reputation of any business rests upon that discernment, and so do the professional status of its employees. A business and its separate business division should share such interests so as to avoid any manifestation of disagreement. Nevertheless, the business should view any deliberate infringement of these rules as a grave misdemeanor that may lead to punitive action, potentially incorporating discharge, subject to the terms of any appropriate collective agreement. In the long run, this acts as the basis for every business reputation and the means by which it accomplishes the public confidence and clients expectations.
Apart from that, it is the sole duty of the business to be accountable to the society, surroundings, and economy to the extent of forming partnerships and associations so as to avert the appearance of prejudice. Cultivating such basis is necessary and effective in familiar surroundings outside of ordinary business times. Businesses rely on rules to make an ethical decision regarding ...