Functions of Technology in Testing Emotional and Mental Conditions (Essay Sample)

Functions of Technology in Testing Emotional and Mental Conditions
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Professor
Date
Functions of Technology in Testing Emotional and Mental Conditions
Evaluating the emotional and mental wellbeing of human beings is essential in ensuring appropriate diagnosis, management, and treatment of physical and psychological diseases. Traditionally, physicians depended on individual self-reporting techniques to assess mental and emotional disorders in patients. Patients’ self-evaluations limit the quality and depth of health information, hindering accurate diagnosis of a victim's behavioral, social, and functional wellbeing. In addition, self-reports are often biased since they rarely account for a patient's daily and real-time functions. Advanced technological devices such as computerized medical equipment help clinicians overcome such limitations by offering up-to-date monitoring of emotional and mental health victims' functions, symptoms, and behavior. Today, computerized sensors and applications help physicians to obtain and analyze a patient’s health in real-time. Although unqualified physicians can misinterpret computer-aided information, computerized devices are vital in mental and emotional status testing because they provide accurate results, enhancing the diagnosis, management, and treatment of mental and emotional disorders.
Advanced technology has encouraged accurate diagnosis, assessment, management, case formulation, treatment, and outcome monitoring of mental and emotional health victims. According to Arean et al. (2016), mental and emotional health analysis is a sophisticated clinical issue, given thatpatients are not subjected to blood tests or diagnostic assays to determine the underlying disease. In the past, physicians relied on individual judgment, opinion, and a victim's self-reports to diagnose, manage, and treatmental and emotional disorders. However, a physician's individual results and patient's self-assessment can be flawed since they depend on retrospective gathering of a victim's functioning that typically occurs outside a patient's milieu, leading to inaccurate diagnosis. Computerized devices such as the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) help physicians capture detailed medical accounts of a patient's emotional and psychological functions (Arean et al., 2016). A physician can then compare a patient's signs and symptoms with another patient's outcomes globally through online medical databases on medical websites, resulting in early and effective diagnosis of causative agents. As such, EMA computerized tools such as sensors and apps capture a broad range of behavioral patterns that lead to a more accurate diagnosis of mental and emotional health issues.
Currently, advanced technological tools enable physicians to obtain a clear view of emotional and mental patients'functions and symptoms over a defined period. According to Arean et al. (2016), global positioning systems (GPS) and accelerometers help clinicians calculate physical and spatial functions that diagnose disorders such as depression, stress, and anxiety. Ferrari et al. (2016) suggest that efficient diagnosis, management, and treatment of emotional and psychological diseases call for computerized testing that overcomes the limitations of traditional tools. For instance, Computer-assisted Client Assessment Survey (iCCAS)offers quality mental health results (Ferrari et al., 2016). Retrospectivemedical reviews point out that emotional and mental health patients are more comfortable completing online questionnaires and surveys, especially regarding sensitive details such as crime, drug and substance abuse, and sexualorientation. Ferrari et al.(2016) state that most patients hesitate to disclose the cause of emotional and mental health issues if they do not conform to the standard ethical codes. Therefore, digitized technology has diversified the scope of screening processes. For this reason, patients and physicians can engage more openly, reducing any communication and treatment barriers.
Conversely, computer-aided emotional and mental testing equipment present physicians and patients with various limitations. Accordingto Gould et al. (2020), unqualified physicians and less knowledgeable patients often misuse computerized evaluation devices.Some psychiatricmedical experts have insufficient knowledge and training about computerized systems in their premises. Thus, they might interpret data inaccurately, leading to an ineffective diagnosis of the underlying mental am emotional disorders. Additionally, some physicians become excessively dependent on computerized devices, overlooking physical symptoms, self-assessments, and other medical observations. Villani (2016) observes that most medical professionals presume that computerized tools such as wearable sensors present factual and error-free details, leading to unfoundedand invalid recommendations. In essence, while technological tools offer more accurate information, physicians should critically consider physical observations and scrutinize the results to avoid false face validity.
To sum up, twenty-first-centu