Hobbit and Homoerectus criticisms (Essay Sample)

“Hobbit and “Homo erectus” Criticism Name Institution Instructor Subject Date The criticism directed to scientists who discovered “hobbit” and thought she represented the human like species faced criticism in that, only one skull was found and raised doubts whether the animal existed for 70, 000 years in Flores Indonesia. Additionally, it also raises questions whether textbooks should be rewritten based on only a single cranium. Moreover, it is not a big idea that a tiny brained animal was discovered in Island of Flores. We should not assume that the tropical environments were conducive in preservation of DNA and were presenting H only, was DNA contaminated, consequently no, however we cannot rely fully on the scientific process (Krause, 2009). On the other hand, Dubois received criticism on his published discoveries on Homo erectus. On his publication he depicted that Homo erectus was under evolution because of its intermediate brain capacity of between 500-1000cc slightly below that of Homo sapiens at 1400cc. Critics argued that, one could have creatures which could have had different brain sizes without having an evolutionary progression from smaller to larger. In this scenario, many Pleistocene mammal species appeared larger than today’s hence, the Homo erectus skull was simply a transition from arthropod to a modern gibbon Accepted Evidence, (n.d). Consequently, the criticisms against Dubois are scientifically valid. The two criticisms can be supported or refuted by the scientists if more evidence is generated to support their hypothesis. Taking an example of Hobbit, one skull cannot make us to alter the whole system that we have understood for years. Therefore, more specimens should be provided to support or reject the hypothesis. The most challenging phenomenon that makes it difficult to reconcile in either direction is lack of enough ...