Intensive critical thinking in the balance of powers in the republic government. (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

Learning Objective: Through intensive critical thinking and analysis of Articles I, I, and III of the U.S. Constitution, students learn how the balance of powers works in a republican form of government. Please note: Must be written in 600 words or more; Font is Calibri 11 point double spaced, APA with bibliography, 1" margin. Must use three sources from this week (at the bottom) and 1 source from another week (at the bottom) the sources are labeled. **** For this assignment, research any one of the topics listed below. Notice the conflicting interests of the parties involved in the issue. Do the mechanisms designed to balance the power of government between institutions and individuals continue to work? Has one center of power grown too powerful? Are individual rights being protected during these disputes? Include a discussion of the balancing mechanisms found in the U.S. Constitution and discussed in Federalist Papers 10, 47, and 51. Topics Sanctuary Cities v Federal Immigration Laws Sanctuary city, Wikipedia How sanctuary cities actually work, Vox, 2017 Obergefell v Hodges: State rights and Same Sex marriage Obergefell v. Hodges, Wikipedia Obergefell v. Hodges Summary | quimbee.com, Quimbee, 2017 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Federal Laws replace State laws Civil Rights Act of 1964, Wikipedia A Confrontation for Integration at the University of Alabama, theGrio, 2013 Transcript Legalizing Marijuana: State Laws v Federal laws Timeline of cannabis laws in the United States, Wikipedia Legalized: A Year In The Life Of Colorado's Legal Weed Experiment | NBC News, NBC News, 2016 Dealing with Factions: Is Federalist Paper No ten still viable? Unite the Right rally, Wikipedia American Patriot, PBS FrontLine, 2017 Individual rights versus the federal government The Sagebrush Rebellion Sagebrush Rebellion, Wikipedia American Patriot, PBS FrontLine, 2017 Drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants Cities and States versus Federal Immigration Law Driver's licenses for illegal immigrants in the United States, Wikipedia New York lawmakers OK allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver's licenses, NBC News, 2019 Wounded Knee 1973 Native Rights versus the Federal Government Wounded Knee incident, Wikipedia We Shall Remain - Episode 5: Wounded Knee, Jeffery Powell, 2017 SCOTUS v Administration Census and citizenship question Supreme Court Leaves Census Question on Citizenship in Doubt, The New York Times, 2019 Census citizenship question: what we know about the debate so far, USA Today, 2019 Voting Right Act of 1965 Voting Rights Act of 1965, Wikipedia The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Explained, Hip Hughes, 2015 The fight for the right to vote in the United States - Nicki Beaman Griffin, Ted-Ed, 2013works in a republican form of government. Please note: Additional requirements for the Primary Assignment can be found by clicking on the Course Assignment Comments headline (above). For this assignment, research any one of the topics listed below. Notice the conflicting interests of the parties involved in the issue. Do the mechanisms designed to balance the power of government between institutions and individuals continue to work? Has one center of power grown too powerful? Are individual rights being protected during these disputes? Include a discussion of the balancing mechanisms found in the U.S. Constitution and discussed in Federalist Papers 10, 47, and 51. Topics Sanctuary Cities v Federal Immigration Laws Sanctuary city, Wikipedia How sanctuary cities actually work, Vox, 2017 Obergefell v Hodges: State rights and Same Sex marriage Obergefell v. Hodges, Wikipedia Obergefell v. Hodges Summary | quimbee.com, Quimbee, 2017 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Federal Laws replace State laws Civil Rights Act of 1964, Wikipedia A Confrontation for Integration at the University of Alabama, theGrio, 2013 Transcript Legalizing Marijuana: State Laws v Federal laws Timeline of cannabis laws in the United States, Wikipedia Legalized: A Year In The Life Of Colorado's Legal Weed Experiment | NBC News, NBC News, 2016 Dealing with Factions: Is Federalist Paper No ten still viable? Unite the Right rally, Wikipedia American Patriot, PBS FrontLine, 2017 Individual rights versus the federal government The Sagebrush Rebellion Sagebrush Rebellion, Wikipedia American Patriot, PBS FrontLine, 2017 Drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants Cities and States versus Federal Immigration Law Driver's licenses for illegal immigrants in the United States, Wikipedia New York lawmakers OK allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver's licenses, NBC News, 2019 Wounded Knee 1973 Native Rights versus the Federal Government Wounded Knee incident, Wikipedia We Shall Remain - Episode 5: Wounded Knee, Jeffery Powell, 2017 SCOTUS v Administration Census and citizenship question Supreme Court Leaves Census Question on Citizenship in Doubt, The New York Times, 2019 Census citizenship question: what we know about the debate so far, USA Today, 2019 Voting Right Act of 1965 Voting Rights Act of 1965, Wikipedia The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Explained, Hip Hughes, 2015 The fight for the right to vote in the United States - Nicki Beaman Griffin, Ted-Ed, 2013 **** Sources from this week, please pick three The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription, Read Articles 1-3, James Madison, National Archives The Federalist Number 47, [30 January] 1788, James Madison, Founders Online The Federalist No. 51, [6 February 1788], James Madison, Founders Online **** Pick 1 sources from another week, (I chose week 4), please. King’s Dream Remains an Elusive Goal; Many Americans See Racial Disparities, PEW Research Center, 2013 The Narrowing, But Persistent, Gender Gap in Pay, Nikki Graf, Anna Brown, & Eileen Patten, PEW Research Center, 2019 Why the Debate about equal pay for U.S. Women’s Soccer isn’t that Clear Cut, Megan McArdle, The Washington Post, 2019 Still the Land of Opportunity?, Isabel V. Sawhill, The Brookings Institution, 1999 3 sources from this week and 1 source from another week MUST be used. any other sources used is considered an add on and must be sighted source..

Content:

Intensive critical thinking in the balance of powers Student’s Name University Course Professor Date Intensive critical thinking in the balance of powers In recent years, there has been considerable debate over the role of sanctuary cities in the United States. These cities aim to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation by limiting cooperation between federal immigration officials and local law enforcement. On one hand, some argue that sanctuary cities are dangerous because they enable illegal immigrants to live in the country without fear of being deported. On the other hand, those who disagree with this view say that sanctuary cities help protect vulnerable populations from harm through increased cooperation between local law enforcement and immigration officials. This paper will discuss how sanctuary cities actually work and whether their mechanisms designed to balance power between institutions and individuals continue to work effectively after decades of use. It will also analyze whether one center of power has grown too powerful or individual rights are being protected during these disputes. The idea of sanctuary cities is a contentious one. The concept is that local and state governments should be able to designate their own policies about how to treat undocumented immigrants, even if federal law takes precedence in those cities. The issue has come up in the recent news cycle because of the current administration's threats to cut funding for any sanctuary city that does not comply with federal immigration law (Madison, n.d.). The concept of sanctuary cities emerged after World War II, when many states adopted policies that prohibited discrimination against Japanese-Americans based on their ancestry or ethnicity. In response, Congress passed an order prohibiting discrimination against Japanese-Americans who were American citizens. As time went on, other groups demanded similar protections: African-Americans during the civil rights movement, women during the feminist movement, gays and lesbians in the fight for marriage equality—all saw themselves as under attack by forces outside of themselves who sought to limit their rights as individuals (Madison, 1788). In response, some state legislatures passed laws declaring that these other groups deserved protection from discrimination by private businesses and public institutions like schools and hospitals. Immigration is a huge issue in the United States right now. Many states have passed legislation to restrict immigration, and many other cities are considering similar measures. One of the major issues is that the federal government has failed to come up with a solution that would adequately protect all parties involved. One way that sanctuary cities work is by declaring themselves as such, which sends a clear message to federal authorities that they cannot arrest people who are in the country illegally for being undocumented. However, it’s important to note that these cities don’t just declare themselves as sanctuaries (Madison, 1788); they also take steps towards protecting individual rights and liberties during these disputes. For example, some cities have laws on their books that ban racial profiling or limit police interaction with immigrants without legal status from going above what is necessary for public safety concerns. These balancing mechanisms are important because they help ensure everyone’s rights are protected during these disputes—ev...

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

Intensive critical thinking in the balance of powers in the republic government. (Essay Sample)

Other Topics: