Ethical Dilemma-Case of To Vaccinate or Not (Essay Sample)

Ethical Dilemma-Case of 'To Vaccinate or Not.'
Student's Name
Institution Affiliation
Assignment due Date
Introduction
An ethical dilemma arises in all professional activities; it occurs when professionals feel that they must do something, even though it may seem unethical in some respects or may be contrary to the principles on which their profession is based. The health professional is one of those confronted with an ethical dilemma in their daily activities. In analyzing the case, I will address 'to vaccinate or not.' In this case, we found a couple who did not want their daughter to be vaccinated because, in their opinion, she might develop certain disorders, such as autism. Such a disorder caused more harm than if the child had remained unvaccinated (Sternberg, 2021). This presented Dr. Kerr with a professional dilemma. He had to convince the couple that vaccinating children was equally important and that an unvaccinated child could easily be exposed to certain diseases that the immune system could prevent(Sternberg, 2021). Dr. Kerr faced the professional challenge of convincing his clients that their decision was doing more harm than good.
The case illustrates an essential metric that health care professionals struggle with. Moral consciousness was evident across the board. The doctor demonstrated considerable autonomy by showing his values and concern for the need to vaccinate Anna, even though the parents disagreed with his advice(Sternberg, 2021). Both parties, the parents and the doctor, were aware of the importance of Anna's vaccination but differed in their views on the reasons that contributed to her conscientious attitude towards vaccination.
The doctor's moral judgment on the issue of vaccination demonstrated a high degree of professionalism. He gave Anna's parents time to explain why they believed their daughter should not be vaccinated(Sternberg, 2021). This provided him with accurate information that helped him make informed decisions. According to the case 'to vaccinate or not,' Dr. Kerr can use Ann's parents' arguments to convince them to vaccinate Ann. The doctor can show that what the parents are saying maybe valid but that vaccinations are more important and should be prioritized. He pointed out that most children die due to a lack of vaccination and that the child's immunity needs to be strengthened to fight diseases that a child who is not vaccinated should not get. To live up to professional ethics, he must convince the parents why he insists on vaccinating Anna. The ability to demonstrate professional behavior best underscores the ethical behavior that a health care worker must always exhibit(Cox, 2022).
The fundamental dilemma, in this case, is whether the doctors should allow the parents not to vaccinate Ann. The case shows that some children remain unvaccinated for medical reasons and survive, while the parents insist that their daughter be vaccinated. The parents don't even want to hear about vaccinations because they feel that their child should not suffer the effects of autism but should grow up healthy, with good nutrition and self-care.
Effective Communication
According to the case 'to vaccinate or not,' Ann's arguments with the doctor and their parents sparked a conversation. The communication between the two was very effective because each could argue clearly, and the other understood well. For example, when Ann's parents were explaining why they did not want their child to be vaccinated. This message was clear to the doctor, who confirmed that the vaccination had an effect, but the trees showed why it was necessary to vaccinate the child. As a result of this communication, the parents agreed with what the doctor was telling them but did not follow his advice because it was clear that they had decided not to vaccinate their child(Cox, 2022). The failure to reach a consensus showed that the doctor may not have demonstrated a deeper understanding of vaccination, making the couple more aware of the importance of vaccinating their child. Thus, the doctor's negotiation approach may not have produced the desired result.
The Answer to the Ethical Dilemma
Although the doctor explained why the vaccination was necessary, Smith did not consider it. He pointed out,