Compare and contrast the political ideologies of any TWO political ideologists Customer (Essay Sample)

Compare and contrast the political ideologies of any TWO political ideologists. Name Institution Course Instructor Date Compare and contrast the political ideologies of any TWO political ideologists. Introduction In the 1600s, European ideologists had begun assessing, debating, and evaluating a person who could govern a nation. This was a notion that was catalyzed by the fact that the absolute rule of leaders and kings had dwindled, making enlightenment thinkers argue and agitate for various systems of social equalities. For instance, as of mid-16th Century civil skirmishes arose over who should govern England; the parliament or the King under Charles. In that case, the conflict terminated with the killing of the English ruler. Subsequently, the war stirred up the rethinking of governance and democracy as the only way of curbing wars; among the ideologists, one cannot fail to illustrate the works done by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Ideologies in the Enlightenment Period Essentially, Hobbes reigned in 1588-1679 and wrote Leviathan as the absolute and relative defense against the power of kings. The name Leviathan reflects a mythical sea-monster that wrecked and consumed a whole ship and likened it to the government, an authoritarian state fashioned to enforce and execute an order. The works of Hobbes started with the description of the “state of nature” where all persons are equivalent as imposed and dictated by nature. According to him, every individual had the freedom to do what they wished to survive. As a result of this concept, human beings live in continual distress and peril of ferocious death, and therefore, humankind’s life is solitary, humble, horrid, ruthless, and short-lived. Hobbes further explicates that in the “state of nature,” there were a lack of rules and laws or an individual to impose those laws; hence, to opt out is for people to execute ultimate power that imposes peace among all members of society. Subsequently, Hobbes borrows the concept of an implied agreement, captured in the English Contractual laws, to assert that individuals agreed to create their natural liberty and equality rights to give absolute and relative power to sovereignty (Hobbes & Missner, 2016). In this case, Hobbes outlines that autonomy makes and imposes laws that secure a peaceful co-existence in society, paving the way for life, liberty, and property to thrive; he calls this phenomenon “a social contract.” Furthermore, he believed in a philosophy that a regime led by a king posed a type of leadership which allowed for sovereignty. In that case, he believed that the exercise of social contract existed among the citizens or subjects, not amid them and the King. Consequently, when the citizens gives their complete and relative power to their King, the people themselves lacked the right to cause a revolution against that King. Furthermore, Hobbes idealized that the religious entities had no right to meddle with issues around the King's government; this is because he feared that the religious constructs would easily become the source of civil rivalry and wars. Subsequently, he advised the religious organs to become a department under the jurisdiction of the King's government, where the King would have absolute power to control and regulate all religious affairs. Any conflict or difference that might arise between the divine and royal laws would result in an individual obeying the King or facing the death penalty. During the time of Hobbes, absolute kings reigned as the world was witnessing a change and emergence of a new rule through the European Enlightenment (Collins, 2020). The ideology that surrounded the Enlightenment thinkers was that of improving human conditions in the world and shelf differences that arise from religious conviction and the life after death. These two ideologists appreciated reason, knowledge, spiritual open-mindedness, and reverence for human and natural rights. The enlightenment thinkers theorized governance development, where all people would govern. Many of them weighed the profound impacts of the U.S. and French upheavals with the system of dramatic administrations that they fashioned. On that note, John Locke (1632-1704), supported the protestant legislature against the Roman Catholic King James II during “the Glorious revolution.” Locke wrote an article, “the Two Treatises of government,” where he supported Hobbes’s idea on the viciousness of the “state of nature” and which further agitated for the social contract to affirm and assure peace (Locke, 2019). The two ideologists, however, disagreed with other on two concepts. The first one was that Locke outlined that natural liberty occurred in the “state of nature” and, therefore, could not be transferred or deprived from an individual. This means that they were inalienable. Contrary, he also in contention with Hob...