Mexican Relations and the Nature of the U.S. (Essay Sample)
the task was to describe US-Mexican relationships. The sample is a discussion of Mexican nationalism; colonial legacies in class relations, land distribution, and/or gender practices; notions of civilization and progress; tensions in Mexican liberalism; and the makeup of the Mexican revolutionaries. it covers the concepts of relationship between the United States and Mexico and the revolution that took place in Mexico under the leadership of Diaz.source..
U. S â€“ Mexican Relations and the Nature of the U.S
The Mexican revolution was the 1910 armed struggle under the leadership of Francisco Madero to oust the incumbent autocrat known as Porfirio Diaz. The armed struggle reached an ultimate end in 1920 with the promulgation of a new constitution. The revolution was the worst unrest in the Latin American country after a very long period of peace and tranquility. The revolution was one of the worst armed struggles that took place in the 20th century. Various elements added up to the manifestation of the armed struggle. Some of them are still justifiable through history while others are contemporary. For instance, processes of empire and nation played significant roles during the revolution. The theme of empire that links the armed struggle with socio-political elements is displayed by the legacies of Spanish colonialism and the U.S imperialism in Mexico and Latin America. Fuentes (23) discusses the analogy of the war that took place in Mexico.
Processes or Empire and Nation during the Revolution
The revolution was a form of retaliation against the leadership of Diaz. He was the leader of the empire for more than 30 years. One time in 1908, Diaz stated that he was looking forward for a democratic presidential election and hence he was ready to embrace another political party for competition. This statement impressed Francisco Madero, a lawyer who took advantage of the situation to launch his campaign for the presidency. However, when the 2010 election time reached, President Diaz had Madero imprisoned as a show of dictatorship (Lucas 34). He declared himself the winner and assumed office immediately. The furious Madero therefore declared war by calling upon all Mexicans to come out and prepare for a revolution. The nation had started to decline and showed the loss of democracy. The people were subjected to dire dictatorial regime during the reign of Diaz. The main option was to topple him through a revolution and reclaim their lost freedom.
Causes the of Revolution
The first cause of the Mexican revolution was the dictatorial rule of Pofirio Diaz during his 30 years in office. Most people were not happy with his imperial and autocratic rule. He was not ready to transform the country into a politically stable nation. The leader was selfish, inhuman, and did not mind the welfare of his subjects. It was obvious from the arrangement made to oust him that the people were not happy with his dictatorial technique of ruling. There was need to design appropriate mechanisms that would guide the nation in enhancing democratic presidential elections.
The second cause of the Mexican crisis was the mistreatment and exploitation of workers. The leader promoted industry in such a way that the working class became exploited. The economy took a substantial leap as he engaged in the construction of dams, factories, roads, and industries. He also supported the agricultural industry. The economic progress increased the number of proletariat in the urban areas. Because of the developed economy, the United States invested in the countryâ€™s economy. This is the point at which its imperialism started to develop. However, the industrial stability had a negative impact on the workers. They were forced to work longer and pay more for their upkeep. Their salary was not sufficient for the up-keep of the working class during the hard economic times.
The third factor that triggered the revolution was the disparity between the poor and the rich. There was a very big gap between the rich and the poor in Mexico and hence the poor felt oppressed. For instance, good education, political power, and wealth were preserved for the few families in the Mexican society. Most of the families that managed to attain high levels of wealth, good education, and land were mainly of European descent (the hacendados).
Land was part of wealth that the common Mexican could not afford during the reign of Diaz. Those individual who belonged to the low class were disadvantageous when it came to land distribution. For instance, the Europeans who settled in Mexico occupied large tracts of land in the vast regions of Mexico. Additionally, the Terraza family alone had over one million acres of land under their jurisdiction. Land distribution was discriminatory since the wealthy and the foreign families took large tracts of land for themselves. Diaz himself allocated so...
- Description Of The Role Of Women In Politics In USDescription: Roles of Women in Politics and other Affairs in USAIntroduction; Power has been always bestowed among men in most countries in the world today. This is not the case in the United State of America....1 page/≈550 words| 3 Sources | APA | History | Essay |
- The Art In Europe: The Heritage Of Social Customs And Ethical ValuesDescription: The arts of movements which are sometimes associated with Western Civilization, Western world, Western Community and Judeo-Greco civilization. However, they are termed in broadly as the heritage of social customs, ethical values, and the traditional customs....1 page/≈275 words| 2 Sources | APA | History | Essay |
- Briefly Discuss Female Circumcision Among Kisii PeopleDescription: Gender violence against women is a total violation of human rights as well as a type of discrimination against female gender and it entails all acts of gender-based violence that are likely to result in a number of issues...3 pages/≈825 words| 5 Sources | APA | History | Essay |