Court Opinion on Edward Vs. Vannoy (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

Explain how the material from this unit bears on the culminating issue.V. Court OpinionYou can expand your case brief into a court opinion. While your case brief was written from the perspective of an attorney for one of the parties of the case, a court opinion is written from the perspective of the judge. Essentially, you are discussing the strongest argument for each party, and then explaining which you find more compelling and why.  Contento Issue- Introduce what the issue is (1-3 sentences)o Position- State your position on the issue (1-3 sentences)o Background- Recap the relevant facts and applicable law (around 250 words)o Arguments- Recap the strongest argument(s) for each position (i.e., the petitioner and the respondent) on the issue (around 300 words each)o Argument analysis- Explain which argument is more compelling. Highlight the reasons that one argument is more compelling than the other. Make sure you take into account both sides and explain how the two arguments interact with each other. For instance, do they differ on facts? On policy considerations? On underlying moral commitments? You can also use this section to discuss precedent. (around 600 words)o Apply your analysis of the arguments to your position (about 300 words) Organizationo Make it obvious that you’ve covered each of the content bullet points. Use section headings.o Clearly explain how the arguments interact with each other and why one is more compelling than the other.o Cover all and only relevant material. Mastery of materialo Incorporate the material from this unit.o Explain how the material from this unit bears on the culminating issue.

source..

Content:

Court Opinion on Edward Vs. Vannoy
Student Name
Institution Affiliation
Court Opinion on Edward Vs. Vannoy
Issue: The issue is whether the decision of the Court in Ramos v. Louisiana which applied the stipulations of the 6th amendment in the establishment of a right to a unanimous jury in both federal and state courts should be applied retroactively to federal collateral review cases. This comes in light of the position held by the US Supreme Court that federal and state courts had a right to a unanimous jury based on the 6th amendment. However, while other states adopted the unanimous jury conviction, Louisiana was one of two states that supported the majority jury votes to achieve conviction.
Position: I firmly believe that the majority jury votes to convict requirement in Louisiana and Oregon is part of the Jim Crow Jury laws that was particularly put in place to silence the concerns and sentiments of Black jurors (Stewart et al., 2017). The lawmakers who created the requirement also sort to prevent Black people from voting in Louisiana and advocated for segregated schools. The requirement was also established to ensure more Black people were sent to prison and to foster white supremacy.

...

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

Court Opinion on Edward Vs. Vannoy (Essay Sample)

Other Topics: