Liebeck vs. McDonald’s Law Essay Research Coursework (Essay Sample)
Critically analyze Liebeck vs. McDonald’s. Give the background information of the case and the final determination by the court
source..
Liebeck vs. McDonald’s
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Liebeck vs. McDonald’s
The business environment is governed by laws that focus on safeguarding the welfare of consumers. Critically, the rules act as guidelines to how business should be practiced to prevent exploitation of customers. In 1994, the case of Liebeck vs. McDonald’s Restaurants was instrumental in showcasing the impact of law in the commercial sector. Specifically, the case involved an injury to the client that reflected partial negligence on the part of McDonald Restaurant, which rightfully led to the award of compensatory and punitive damages to Liebeck, making, and, therefore, the case cannot be classified as a frivolous lawsuit.
Analysis
To begin with, the incident that led to the case constituted a spillage of coffee. The accident occurred in 1992 after Stella Liebeck bought coffee from McDonald's and while traveling in a grandson’s vehicle (Weiman, 2018). Weiman clarifies that the injury arose when the grandson stopped the car in a bid to allow his grandmother an opportunity to put additives to the coffee. Unfortunately, when she opened the lid, the coffee spilled onto her lap, which led to burns on her thighs and groin. Hence, the accident led to a legal case against McDonald's as Liebeck wanted compensation for her injuries.
Other Topics:
- Strict liability. J&J Hit with $1 Billion Verdict in Hip Implant Product Liability CaseDescription: In the year 2016, Johnson & Johnson Company was directed by the court in Texas to give a compensation of close to $1 billion to the plaintiffs on allegationsthat the company had deliberatelyhiden the defects on its hips products and had to be removedsurgically (Feeley&Korosec, 2016). ...1 page/≈275 words| 2 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Legal Opinion in the Case of Kadlec Medical Center vs Lakeview 2005Description: This lawsuit arises rom statement or omission made or omitted by defendants LRMC, Louisiana Anesthesia Associates, L.L.C and Doctors Dennis,Preau,parr and Baldone,in professional reference letters or credentialing letters written on behalf of Dr. Robert Lee Berry .Dr. Berry practiced anesthesiology at ...5 pages/≈1375 words| 5 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- The Case of Kadlec Medical CenterDescription: This lawsuit arises rom statement or omission made or omitted by defendants LRMC, Louisiana Anesthesia Associates, L.L.C and Doctors Dennis,Preau,parr and Baldone,in professional reference letters or credentialing letters written on behalf of Dr. Robert Lee Berry .Dr. Berry practiced anesthesiology at LRMC ...5 pages/≈1375 words| 5 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |