Terrorism and Freedom Fighters: Victims of a Terrorist Act (Essay Sample)

Terrorism
Name
Paper name
Professors’ Name
Date
 HYPERLINK "http://essayjedii.com/order/view/9362" \o "terrorism" 

Often the victims of a terrorist act, like the violent actors as terrorists would be the violent actors like freedom fighters, protectors of the people, or some other selfless, where their actions are responsible for the today's state of the world in which they live. It is important to remember to understand fully the terrorism and the terrorism of the players in the way of thinking, it is necessary to look at from many points of view and appreciate the kind of motivation and drive to the terrorist acts of the operators, which they are doing against the victims of terrorism (Combs and Martin, 2007).
Instead, the operators of terrorism often seek to achieve the greatest possible political impact of the statement and to draw attention to the plight or requirements. Therefore, targeting defenseless civilians first is seen as a way to achieve their goals (Wardlaw, 1990). A major proportion of the benefits of committing a violent act of terrorism a person is often followed the political storm, and fear in the population, which is due to such an action. Such a situation can provide an atmosphere in which actors of terrorism perhaps demands met. In fact, the actual violence does not necessarily advance his case at all or is meaningful objective than to instill terror and fear in the hopes of getting the consent of the subject (Laqueur, 1977).
In this sense, the large-scale action to commit a violent attack in a public way and using the media and communication outlets influence public opinion is in some ways a terrorist actor major objective. Often, the point of view of terrorist operators’ point of views is not to do acts of terrorism; rather, they are fighting back, or rebelling against situations they consider unjust and unreasonable, the only way they have available. Many of the terrorist operators consider themselves as military operators, and believe that they are at war with each other. However, somewhat than fight in a straight manner with the current army, terrorists use the imperfect weapons and artillery they have at their disposal and aim at things and people that cannot defend themselves and fight back instead. Often simply threatening to commit acts of violence or having a name to the fact that the presentation of the requirements before the terrorists through violence and threaten a response. That is why the terrorist study focusing on the individuals and not the actors point of view.
In 2000-century "Coombs identify the element of the terrorism which are: dynastic terror, this is an attack on the head of State or the power elite, just the kind of terrorist acts that the international community has tried to criminalize in the mid-nineteenth century (Combs and Martin, 2007). Focused Random terror, random terrorism, limits the placing of explosives: for instance, to where important agents of repression are likely to meet (as in the case described above Polish resistance movement). Mass Terror: Mass Terror is the terror of the State, where the Government forces of the opposition in the general population, organized or unorganized, sometimes in the way institutionalized (Combs and Martin, 2007). The random terror involves placing of explosives, where people gather (e.g. Post Office, railways, and cafes), to wipe out whoever held there. For example "The Algerian revolutionary left bombs in public places in Paris," one researcher notes, "apparently sure that one Frenchman threatens to bits was appealing much like any other." Tactical Terror: tactical terror is directed solely against the ruling government as part of a "broad revolutionary strategic plan"(Combs and Martin, 2007).
Terrorism is violence; it is a tactic that is used in, war conflict, and peace. The threat of terrorism is at all times present, and the attack is likely to occur when least expect it. A terrorist attack could be in the event, which marks the transition from conflict to peace or war (Wardlaw, 1990). Terrorism is "the calculated use of violence or threat of violence to inculcate fear; the purpose of the force or to intimidate Governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are political, religious, or ideological.”
Terrorism is a particular kind of violence. The formal definition states that terrorism is calculated. The terrorists know what they are doing. Their choice of target is planned and rational. They know the effect they intended to (Wilkinson, 1977). Acts of terrorism are not spontaneous or random. The purpose of terrorism is to produce fear; by implication, that the fear is caused by someone other than the victim. In other words, the effect of terrorism is to be implemented for the public; the definition of the objectives aimed at. Terrorism is motivated by political, religious or ideological objectives (Schmid and Jongmanlbert, 1988) in mind, the objectives of the terrorists are always political, religious or ideological beliefs drive extremist groups tend to seek political power to force their views which differ from those of the society.
The aim of terrorism is distinguished from personal interest, such as violent acts of criminal violence. However, it also allows the definition to promote violence to organized crime at the time when it is seeking to influence government policy. Some of the drug cartels and other international criminal organizations engage in political activities while working to influence independent functioning (Crenshaw, 1995). The essence of terrorism is to create fear by someone other than its victims, the Government or the rest of the public, will change the political activity. Terrorism is the common practice of insurgencies, but the rebels are not necessarily terrorists, if they follow the rules of war and are not engaged in violence as terrorist attacks (Laqueur, 1977). Whereas the legal characteristic is clear, it hardly ever inhibits terrorists who prove to themselves that their actions are reasonable by a higher law. Terrorist’s single-minded keenness to a goal, though poorly it may be expressed, renders legal approve somewhat ineffective.
Throughout the history, extremist groups practiced the fear of terrorism to force a change in behavior. Often terrorism was linked to other forms of violence, such as war or rebellion. At the beginning of the 20th century, the terrorists started to attack the people previously considered innocent to create political ...