Possible Extinction of the African Elephant Due to Human Impacts (Essay Sample)

Name
Professor's name
Course
Date
Possible Extinction of the African Elephant Due to Human Impacts
Introduction
In the past, humans practiced hunting and gathering as a way of finding food. They would hunt down animals for food and feed the different communities. Over time, as the human population grew. The growth in human population meant that there was an increased demand in food, thus leading to an increased number of animals to hunt down. It became impossible for the humans to solely depend on animals for food. Another result with the increased human population was increased demand for land. The humans turned to cutting down or burning vegetation. In the process, some animals were burnt down. There was also an increased demand for vegetation for the animals and it was more of the “survival for the fittest”.
With time, certain animal species reduced in number and some became extinct. It was not only experienced with the animals, but also with some plants. In the recent day, there has been increased awareness on the negative effects of certain human action to plants and animals. People have to obtain licenses to hunt, and even then, there are certain rules and guidelines they have to follow. The action has been taken to prevent the extinction of certain animals. There are certain individuals, however, who aren’t concerned with the animals. They poach the animals for different personal and material gains. It is a threat to the world’s wildlife. The paper focuses on the Loxodonta africana elephant species in Africa. The Loxodonta africana is the Savanna Elephant (Comstock, 2492).
Research
Between 2003 and 2014, elephants have been killed greatly especially in Central Africa, thus becoming difficult to sustain the elephant population and demand of the tasks. Between 2007 and 2009 and 2011 and 2014, West Africa also killed so many elephants and it is hard to keep up with the killing. Botswana is one country that has faced high rates of elephant poaching. They have, however, invested in the protection of their elephants in the past years. They have managed by relocating the elephants to safer areas and also translocation of the elephants from the areas they are more prone to being poached. In South Africa, the poaching was frequent but reduced significantly and there was no poaching 2000 and 2003. The graph below shows the poaching trend in the Kruger National Park in South Africa. It is predicted that by the end of next year, about 45 elephants will have been killed (Walsh, 1197).
 EMBED Excel.Chart.8 \s 

In Kenya, an annual report was given in 2012 showed that there were thirty eight thousand elephants. In 2013, the report that shows that three hundred and two elephants were poached that year. The Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), however, realized that the elephant’s population had grown in the same year by one thousand and forty elephants in the areas they monitored. In 2014, the number of the elephants poached reduced to one hundred and thirty seven elephants.
Results
Different human actions have led to the decline in the number of elephants. Most elephants die as a result of human action rather than natural causes or old age. People hunt down the elephants for their ivory. The ivory is used to produce ornaments. The ornaments are mainly high-end and fetch high profits to the manufacturers. There is therefore, an increased demand in the ivory for the production of more ornaments. Other human actions that have led to the decrease in the number of animals is feeding on them, which is less common for elephants and overexploitation of land leading to reduced vegetation for the animals to feed on, which leads to an overall effect on the food chain (Fay, 28).
The situation has become very serious in the recent days. Some people and organizations have decided to start up animal orphanages for rescuing the animals. Most of the young elephants there have been rescued after their mothers were found killed and their ivories taken away. Before the orphanages, such calves died after their mothers died since it was difficult for them to adapt to the environment without their mothers, and some would even starve to death after their mother were killed. Others are the animals rescued, some having been injured by humans after leaving the forests in such of food. The orphanages help treat the wounds till the elephants fully recover and are then returned to the forests. Sometimes people attack the elephants even when they mean no harm to the human life.
Analysis
From the above chart that represents data from a South African Park, it shows how poaching has been on the rise. If 45 elephants are poached in the next year as predicted, it means that by 2020, the poachers might be killing around 100 elephants each year, and the number keeps rising. The data shows there is a great threat to the elephants and worse so the species that are fewer in number. It is an indication that there is great need to deal with the poaching before some of the elephant species become extinct.
For the Loxodonta Africana, they are mostly in family groups of between one elephant and seven elephants. There are many single adult female families, which is a result of most of the male being poached or dying of natural causes. Some elephants also don’t have kins, which is uncommon among the elephants since they have much value for the family unit. When it comes to attacks from poachers, they mainly target the single adult female families. This is because there is less resistance from the elephants. With a male-dominated family, the head of the family tries to attack the intruder. It gives other elephants the morale to fight back. It therefore reduces the chances of poacher success (Brugiere, 442). Some families are thus more vulnerable than others. The weights of the elephants also affect their chances of poached. The table below shows the group compositions and their weights. The table below shows the elephant group sizes and their frequencies as compared to the Amboseli elephants.
Table  SEQ Table \* ARABIC 1: Elephant Group SIzes and Frequencies in Savannah Elephants
Elephant group sizesFrequency00130233324475262Table  SEQ Table \* ARABIC 2: Elephant Group SIzes and Frequencies in Amboseli Elephants
Elephant Group SizesFrequency00102435455964748191104112123130140151161170181
When people feed on the elephants, it becomes impossible to keep up with the demand. An illustration is that if one elephant feeds a particular community for three weeks, the community will have to hunt down an elephant monthly. That community alone will feed on a minimum of twelve elephants annually. On the other hand, the gestation period of an elephant is two years. It is clear that the rate of supply is inversely proportional to the supply of the elephants.
Another thing is the overexploitation of land as a result of the increased human population. With increased population, more land is required for both settlement and cultivation. People cut down trees so that they can acquire more land. Sometimes they burn down the vegetation. Other times people burn charcoal in the forests, which sometimes lead to huge fires that go on even for days. While fires are used, it is possible that some animals die in the fires. Other than the fires, the reduced vegetation leads to the elephants searching for greener pastures. As a result, they leave the forests. They sometimes destroy farmers’ crops. Other times they may attack and kill people. Angry mobs then fight and kill the elephants before the responsible parties and associations are able to rescue them (Caughley, 160).
Discussion
One reason for protecting the animals is for the future generations. The reason we found and are lucky to have seen the elephants is because the generations before protected the animals. It is only fair for the future generations to have a chance to see the elephants rather than just reading about them. It will also give future generations enough reasons to conserve the environment and also protect the animals. If the current generation doesn’t, the future generations will use the failure as an excuse for not protecting what they finding or for failing to conserve the environment.
Africa has greatly depended on wildlife revenue over the years. Wildlife fetches the countries revenue, with some countries like Kenya having wildlife as their main source of revenue. If the animals aren’t protected and become extinct, the visitors and tourists to Africa will reduce significantly. Looking at the recent security threats that Africa has faced, they complained of reduced income. A country like Kenya, for example, suffered greatly from the terror attacks that had some of the tourists return to their homes, some before the dates they had planned to leave and others after their mother countries advised them to return to their home countries. During the time, different rates such as the hotel rates reduced greatly to attract tourists. Assuming that the animals are extinct, there would be a reduced number of tourists visiting thus reduced economic growth in Africa.
While still focusing on Africa’s economic position, the current poaching doesn’t add economic value to the continent (Burton, 104). When the tasks are sold and exported, it’s all done illegally. Therefore, the involved parties don’t pay tax since it is an illegal business. The money obtained from the business helps only a few number of people. The money is used to pay bribes to manage to poach and even transport the elephants’ tasks. Other than the few beneficiaries, it doesn’t add economic value to the continent.
Africa isn’t the only continent that would suffer as a result of the animals becoming extinct. T...