Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssayPsychology
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Describe Two ‘Non-Traditional' Parenting Set-Ups And Discuss How These Relate To Child Outcomes (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

Subject:
Psychology
Topic:
Describe two ‘non-traditional' parenting set-ups and discuss how these relate to child outcomes.
- British English - in-text citation is expected when the statement is made Introduction: - Talk about what is going to be covered in the discussion Main Body: - Define terms when it is used with an in-text citation - Research support with critical thinking on the source after the finding are discussed. Such as the methodology of the study. - a nontraditional family could be Gay/Lesbian family, Adolescent parents, Adoptive & foster parents, stepfamilies, Grandparents as parents etc. -Gay/lesbian is preferred to be one of the choice Summary: - Is there enough research - What can be improved in future studies?
Extras ordered: none

source..
Content:

Non-Traditional Parenting Set Ups
Student’s Name
Institution
Course
Date
Non-Traditional Parenting Set-Ups
Introduction
To shed light on the issue of non-traditional setups, it is important to first define the prevailing notion of customary child raising (Dines & Humez, 2003). Hence, families termed as being traditional comprise of a man, woman and their offspring. This is regardless of whether the children in question are either attained through birth or legal adoption methods. Nevertheless, Dines & Humez (2003) postulate that in most contemporary societies there has been an alteration to this kind of setting on the agenda thus characterizing a more enlarged variety of family options. For this reason, it is possible to refer to numerous modern communities as being non-traditional. Ideally, the latter parenting frameworks, also commonly known as substitute techniques, include polygamy, single paternity, same sex families and living together (Dines & Humez, 2003). As such, this paper mainly provides an in depth analysis on the non-traditional parenting setups with an insight on the ways in which the structures under discussion relate to the outcomes of children.
Same Sex Families
In essence, akin gender couples are referred to as people of the same sex dwelling concurrently in one home and publicizing an actual and existent relationship. This kind of marriage was legalized in the fall of 2015 in most states in America (Johnson, 2016). Over the years, the union between two men or two women has been a heated area of international dispute. This is mainly due to the controversy involved in the issue under discussion. Nevertheless, Christine (2012) asserts that even after being made legal, most lesbian and gay families still face a lot of negativity especially in countries where it is termed as a taboo.
According to Christine (2012), recent research indicates that children brought up in such a setup indicate no difference with those born and bred into heterogeneous settings. As a result, this argument has been used in court rulings pertaining to the nature of perfect union to raise up children. In the same way, case studies report that children of same sex couples possess high potentials of making normal progress in school, just like those from other marital frameworks. Nevertheless, other scholars are of the view that the kind of family setups in question could lead to confusion in the children’s gender identity. This is due to the inevitable early juvenile acquaintance with the gay or lesbian archetype.
Cohabitation
Fundamentally, this aspect of cohabitation refers to the element whereby an unmarried couple lives together in a given home (Johnson, 2016). Statistics from the United States’ head count in the fall of 2012 indicated that such families inclusive of children constituted up to 15 million homes of the entire population (Johnson, 2016). Additionally, this type of union can also classify as a substitute to marriage where those seeking to test their compatibility or those prohibited by the law could seek refuge in marital concerns. Nevertheless, such relationships do not obtain the consistent official acknowledgment or permissible profits associated with matrimony. For this reason, individuals living together could face societal censure from other family members or conviction groups where customary marriage is regarded as the epitome of any relationship.
Here, recent studies indicate that nurturing children in cohabiting backgrounds tends to be more difficult than in a matrimonial setting. More specifically, case studied conducted in America show that most of such relationships exist for a maximum of only five years (Johnson, 2016). In turn, this type of shaky union leads to detrimental issues on the children. This is usually primarily in their behavioral and intellectual aspects. To this effect, a study conducted in early 2008 indicated that in cohabiting relationships, children have a high probability of engaging in early sexual undertakings than those from normal marriages (Johnson, 2016). However, this conduct is usually brought about by minimal attention and care offered to the children on the agenda by their parents as opposed to the insecure union.
Single Parenthood
Ideally, single parenthood pertains to a person who bears the responsibility of bringing up the children with minimal or without help from another individual (Marnie, 2015). Some of the main causes of this kind of paternity include the death of ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!