Creation and Evolution Theory (Essay Sample)

Creation Theory Name Institution Course Details Date Creation and Evolution Theory Theory of evolution came at a time when Christians strongly believed that God created everything in the world and the entire universe. In this theory it is believed that the creator created both the living and nonliving things. It is believed that god created the world and that existed before the beginning of time. "All the creation activities took place within six days" (Drees, 2000, pg. 45). God rested on the seventh day. There is no material evidence that to affirm that God created the universe as this is only based on individual believe (Grudem and Purswell, 2000). On the other hand there are other theories that have been so far postulated to explain the existence of the universe. Some of this theories are convincing while others are not. Darwin’s theory of evolution provide the biggest contempt of the creation theory (Drees, 2000). In the context of God action to the world. Buke, hick, spivey, smith, Einstein and Tillich, all agree that religion cannot be the soul explanation of the physical existence of the universe. In this view, religion cannot explain where all the physical object in the world came from. For, example, Bube believed that God existed and was in charge of creating all the material things of the world. Bube so evolution to be a plan by God to help in the creation of man. This therefore means that there is no difference between evolution and creation story as advocated by proponent of the evolution theory and hence biological evolution is viewed as a product of creation. This therefore implies that God himself determined the evolution process (Gruden and Purswell, 2000). On the other hand Einstein does not believe in the evolution theory, as a result he is not among the theistic evolutionist. He does not believe in God who interferes with the conduct of human life and affair (Herderson, 2007). Science has thus been integrated with religious beliefs and practices in order to come up with a consensus on the divergent view of Evolution and creation Theories. This has reduced the Controversial gap that existed between creation and evolution. It is due to this integration that the inherent conflict between religious literalism and scientific materialism has slowly been negated and contained. There is need to use science and religion interchangeably in explaining the existence and occurrence of unknown things (Henderson, 2007). The main reason of using science and religion interchangeably is that if one tries to distinguish the body of science and as a reasoning to get a real solution, we realize that thre is some situation that there is some situation that we cannot make conclusion with highest precision. Religion will be required in order to relate some of this act to supernatural powers because science can explain natural situation that can be seen, touched and measured. On the other hand doubt arising from supernatural powers can be explained using religious literalism. In this case it is important to work towards uniting the regious literalism and science materialism to establish the virtue of supportiveness of the two point of actions (Dress, 2000). The other way of bringing this two theories together is by comparing hoe the sciences and religion derive their elemental principal. For example, religion might use different methodology from that of science but the result is accumulation of knowledge. We hence view science and religion as tool that help in meeting a common goal that is providing of knowledge. It is therefore important that we see the two processes actually complimenting each other and in the event of a disagreement, attempt should be made to see if the result would be consistent to the belief of the religion (Henderson, 2007). It is fact that scientific researches utilize various methodology and rely on multiple assumption however, assumption are not always true and are subject to change. This therefore make it possible for scientific findings to give conclusion that contradict literalism. In this case, it does not mean that once there is controversial in scientific findings that religious perception cannot hold. The possibility that the basic pillar relied upon during the formulation of the result was unsuitable is present. Consequently, the result may be invalid. In a case like this the people involved in the research should make a point of reviewing their findings, which may make the ...