Moral Dilemma Relating to Cultural Diversity and Multiculturalism (Essay Sample)
Type of paper
Essay (Any Type)
Number of pages
Format of citation
Number of cited resources
Type of service
For this assignment propose a scenario where you or someone you know are confronted with a moral dilemma relating to cultural diversity and multiculturalism. It cannot be the same as what was covered in the week one discussion. Cultural diversity refers to religious, sexual, racial, and other forms of social difference. A moral dilemma is a situation in which one must make a decision between two or more options such that the options involve seemingly ethical and/or unethical conduct. Address the following questions: What was the situation? What did the dilemma involve? What would a subjective moral relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma? Why would that kind of relativist say that? What would a cultural relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma? Why would that kind of relativist say that? Is that approach correct? What did you the person confronting the dilemma decide to do? What moral justification did they give? Is that approach morally correct? Was there an objective moral truth (the objectively right thing to do) in this situation? Why or why not? Remember, the dilemma should be detailed with desсrіption and dialogue. Regard the questions as requirements. This is an essay, so rather than simply providing a list of brief answers to questions, provide an in-depth reflection regarding a difficult ethical situation.. Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources) answer this as well: St. Augustine in the 5th Century held that we are free to make choices in life. This is the idea of free will. It may seem at first glance odd for a religious thinker to say that we have free will. After all, if God exists, then God created all things. God knows already what we will do. God can cause anything to occur. If we cause things to occur, that seems to be a limitation on the power of God and not make God all-powerful. There are also religion traditions that say that we have no free will. There are some theologians in Islam who seem to suggest that is true. In order for this line of reasoning to hold true, one would need to believe free will is an illusion and that we have no control over how we live our lives, but rather that we are puppets moving and acting due to God′s will and the powers of destiny and fate. And if this then in the case, how can we possibly be responsible for our actions? The considerations above show us to what degree our religious beliefs can shape us. For instance, someone who believes in free will may experience way more guilt than someone who believes we don′t have free will and thus aren′t responsible for the choices (and consequences) of the actions we take. Personal struggles with religion and ethics occur in many places, including in the healthcare arena. Consider the following: You are a nurse in a hospital. A 12 year-old was brought to the hospital by an ambulance. The parents have just arrived at the hospital. This 12 year-old has lost a large amount of blood and requires a transfusion. The parents happen to be members of a religion that believes that blood transfusions are immoral. They want to remove the child from the hospital and prevent the transfusion even if it means the death of the child. You have to decide whether or not you will participate in an action that violates the will of the parents and aid in providing blood for the child. If you choose to participate, and even if you are able to legally justify it, you have to think about the distress you are creating for the parents. If you refuse to aid here, you may be subject to retaliation from the hospital. What is the moral thing for the nurse to do here? Initial Post Instructions For the initial post, address the following questions: What would a divine command ethicist say is the moral thing to do here? Why would they say that? Do you agree with the divine command ethics? Why or why not? Evaluate what a natural law ethicist would say is right to do. Do you agree with them? Why or why not? Given what you said are the right things to do, what would an emotivist say about your positions and judgments? What role does subjectivity play here in determining what is ethical? Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source) APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Moral Dilemma Relating to Cultural Diversity and Multiculturalism
Moral Dilemma Relating to Cultural Diversity and Multiculturalism
Situation and the dilemma involved
Nursing departments face a moral dilemma. Female nurses find it challenging to work together with their colleague Mark having heard about his allegations of multiple sexual offenses. At work, mark talks suggestively to women that confirm his sexual interest towards them. Conversely, mark performs his duties as a nurse with professionalism, and other staff perceives him as an expert and very useful in the department. Regarding the track record on sexual offenses, the nursing department faces a dilemma of whether to tolerate his alleged sexual behaviors or lose such as credible performing nurse.
Subjective moral relativist approach to the dilemma
Moral relativism aids individuals to perceive ethical decisions as subject to a specific viewpoint. It also implies no set of principles to describe different individual morality (Arıkan, 2020). Therefore, Mark is innocent since, from subjective moral relativism, an individual is innocent unless confirmed guilty; thus, mark is not guilty of any offense. Accordingly, mark's behaviors are labeled unethical at the workplace, and measures should be put in place to deter him.
Cultural relativist approach to the dilemma
Cultural relativism judges individuals based on their practices, beliefs, and values in cultural setups (Agyemang, 2018). Mark should be predestined and legal proceedings taken upon by radical feminists. Consequently, a better understanding of the department and the complainant before making judgments may discourage discrimination and promote cohesion in the department.
Actions by person confronting the dilemma
By understanding the dilemma, individuals fixed to moral dilemmas can rightfully decide without undermining both parties. Marks should continue with his duties when the problem is straightforward and resolved. The approach is viable sine both parties will get justice.
The objective moral truth
The objective moral truth was Mark to be referred to a therapist since it might deter recidivism. Mark is currently not guilty; it is unjustifiable to terminate his contract because he is still impressive at the department.
Divine command ethicist approach
Divine command ethics would articulate that, Supreme Being decides on what is wrong and right. In the above textbooks, individuals have the free will to perform activities that pleases God (Rachel, 2019). Furthermore, morality is not based on human nature or the consequences of their actions; instead, it is based solely on the Supreme Being dictates. Every individual has their own beliefs; as a nurse, my beliefs are correct on the right of life no matter their religious stand. It is morally right to save the teen even though the parents feel offended to keep their Child through blood transfusion. I believe as a nurse; my role is to save a life which is morally right.
Natural law ethicist approach
Natural decree believes that individuals possess some fundamental values that direct their manners and reasoning. Thus, rules on the wrong and the right are not created by judges n
- Biblical Metanarrative Analysis Essay SampleDescription: The biblical meta-narrative is a unique storyline that presents a divine logic incorporating the stories in the Bible to show that God is one, has a plan, and is a complete story (Toth, 2019). The narrative covers Genesis to Revelation and centers on God, who is the creator of everything and the ruler....2 pages/≈550 words| 3 Sources | APA | Religion & Theology | Essay |
- In Search of True SelfDescription: The article, 'In Search of True Self', describes Mark Pierpont as a Christian evangelist who is sexually attracted to other men but tries to refrain himself from sleeping with men due to his religious beliefs. The author attempts to find out how a person should find out which aspect counts as his or her tru...1 page/≈275 words| 2 Sources | APA | Religion & Theology | Essay |
- Comparison between 1 Corinthians 12-13 and Romans 12Description: There were divisions among the Corinthians based on preferences towards particular leaders, how they perceive ethical behavior and social status. The divisions were also influenced by spirit.ual gifts such as performing miracles, speaking in tongues and prophecy. Paul used the metaphor involving one body...6 pages/≈1650 words| 3 Sources | APA | Religion & Theology | Essay |