Ethical Implications of Preventive Detention and Interrogation Tactics (Essay Sample)

Preventive Detention and Interrogation Tactics
Student's Name
Department; University/College
Course Code and Number
Instructor's Name
Date
Preventive Detention and Interrogation Tactics
Asserting of the identity of interest amid state and society in punishment is attributed as government push for increased power in punishing criminals. The necessity of prosecution is to protect the community from rapists, murderers where deterrent confinement is needed since individual citizens ordered safety rather than for any specific self-interest of the government. Opposing state punishment power emphasizes the difference between the interests of the regime and social groups. The state's power is presented as an extension of social supremacy, but outsiders exercise power over the community.
Innovations in the technology of criminal justice may be divided into two hard and soft technologies. Complex technology has devices and equipment used in committing, preventing, or controlling crime. The respect of citizens seems to be complicated due to constitutional rights regardless of where they are held since they can still be enemies with the executive's ability to detain and interrogate them. Initial distinctions may be amid criminal justice innovations through the hard material support beside less touchable information squashy base (Alison, 2017). Soft technologies spin use of information to stop crime deliberately to increase police presentation. Innovations of soft technology include software programs, crime scrutiny techniques, sharing of data, and classification systems. The state's power is presented as an extension