Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssaySocial Sciences
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
No Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.4
Topic:

Market Socialism: Soft budget constrain (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

The Philosophic arguments will consist of two sections. The first section is a summary of the position. The second section further explains at least 2 ideas you agree with or disagree with and at least two “reasons” why/why not for each idea. A “Reason” is an explained principle (personal, moral, political, etc.). Reviews are to be typed 12 font Times New Roman and be at least 1000 words.

 

Philosophic Argument #4 Improvement Area

 

 

Thesis:

Compose a thesis regarding the main argument in the reading using the Thesis Help Document on Blackboard and the following:

1)      Use common (i.e. non-source language) to communicate the argument.  Your audience is your peers.

2)      Provide the key motivation behind the argument (i.e. the “why” or the “because” – for example, so-and-so argues this-and-that DO TO or BECAUSE…).

3)      Underline your thesis statement in your paper.

 

Organization:

After developing a thesis, compose a simple outline prior to writing the body of your paper.  This outline should identify the major concepts the author uses to develop the thesis /argument.  Each major concept should then be developed in a separate paragraph in the body of the paper.  Below is a simple format:

 

Thesis:­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

  1. Concept #1:___________________________________________________
  2. Concept #2:___________________________________________________
  3. Concept #3:___________________________________________________
  4. Concept #4:___________________________________________________
  5. Concept #5:___________________________________________________

 

Sub Theses:

Compose a sub thesis regarding the main concepts in your outline above using the Thesis Help Document on Blackboard and the following:

1)      Use common (i.e. non-source language) to communicate the argument.  Your audience is your peers.

2)      Provide the key motivation behind the argument (i.e. the “why” or the “because” – for example, so-and-so argues this-and-that DO TO or BECAUSE…).

3)      Underline EACH of your Sub thesis statements in your paper.

source..
Content:

Market socialism
Name
Institution
Date
Thesis
Many countries since the year 1989 have beyond reasonable doubt painted the picture of dismal performance of socialism economy. Socialism failure can however be attributed to three features; state ownership of means of production, non-competitive markets and non-democratic politics, and administrative allocation of resources. Competitive socialism however negates the second and last features of socialism asserting that competitive politics and competitive allocation of resources without replacing the owner of the resources would mitigate collapse of socialism economy.
Outline
Market socialism
Soft budget constrain
Market Socialism
Market socialism is a principle that refers to economic systems where means of production are owned, managed and administered publicly. In this system, the market is usually utilized towards distribution of resources as economic output and generally refers to related but distinct systems. The first one is Traditional market socialist economy where the prices are determined by the state and are either owned by the state or owned and managed by the employees. This model does not allow for a centralized management by the planners. The second is market socialism which is used to refer a system that utilizes market forces. The pricing system, allocation and distribution of resources are directed by the public. The government offers mechanisms to direct the economic activities and regulations of other enterprises. In major economies however, the ownership is retained with the government.
Market socialism proponents argue that for an economy to grow to its full potential, competitive markets is necessary. Albeit the necessity, full scale ownership does not provide enough need for the thriving economy. Lack of understanding for this fundamental distinction between private ownership and competitive market is what has led to death of socialism in most states (Bardhan & Roemer).
The main problem with socialism, which is what results to its failure, is public ownership of resources. If we can redefine the ownership system of the public or state means of production towards a competitive market then socialism would not result to its dismal performance. Thus the proposal from these proponents includes removal of firms from the state's orbit i.e. from the politics of the state. However, no individual would be granted the right of ownership. Individuals operating the entities will have rights to profits of firms, and, in some cases, will even trade the rights given but will not capitalize on these kinds of trade for profit making purposes (Bardhan & Roemer).
Such trading might however beckon capitalism way of checking the effectiveness of the strategy. Monitoring of the institutions would therefore be done by the banks or other firms in the same financial group to assess their performance. Under this kind of market, surplus resources after payment of wages and taxes are redistributed to the workers for private consumption or social investment.
In the economic perspective, the citizens also regulate the level of public bad for instance pollution the firms may emit. This level of pollution is determined and also the competitive equilibrium maintained in the economy. In other words, the level of the public bad that is allowed will be chosen by the voters in respect to other alternative methods.
One of the reasons why this kind of market socialism does not work is because social democracy requires rather special political circumstances that are absent in many countries for which our market socialism proposal may be feasible.
Soft budget constrain
Soft budget constrain focuses on the motivation of managers in public firms. In a private firm, the entrepreneur gains or loses depending on the performance of the firm. In a salaried public firm, the manager has fewer stakes and will have their remuneration despite the performance of the firm and will have less motivation to want to perform better. That manger operates under what is called the “soft budget constraint” (Kornai, Maskin, & Roland).
In a soft budget constrain, political accountability dominates over the financial accountability. Soft budget constrain presents two problem. 1. Information problem and 2. Political problem which usually involves the state. In the first instance, a government may have the will to control and demand efficiency from the firm. However, it may not have enough information on what needs to be done for the firm’s poor performance. Private owned firms do not suffer from this problem.
Capitalist organizations with large shareholders may however face the problem of management and monitor problems. A capitalist organization with many shareholders is akin to a socialist organization which is practically owned by nobody because it is owned by everybody. Nobody takes responsibility. Thus a capitalist system with many owners would be similar to a socialist firm.
Soft budget constrain may also appear as a political problem. The problem that arises from this specific problem is the question of who monitors the bank as the monitor of the corporate groups in socialized markets....
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!