Pragmatic Application of Kavka's "The Toxin Puzzle" (Essay Sample)

The Toxin Puzzle
Name
College
Course
Prof. Name
Date
The Toxin Puzzle
Introduction
To human beings it seems like puzzles and Paradoxes are necessary; it is like we want the challenge presented to us by something that has many solutions or by something we can’t solve in order to keep our minds active. At times these puzzles are unadulterated theory; some of the time, they can be believed to have a more pragmatic application.
I will argue that the Kavka’s theory of toxin puzzle raises an issue for “Responsibility Theodicy,” this theory states that the reason God normally doesn't intercede to stop malicious impacts of our activities is that such mediation will subvert the chance of our being liable for surviving or turning away from evil. The unmistakable theodicy appears to necessitate that God have the option to do what specialist in toxin theory can't do: stay by an arrangement to do some activity at future time despite the fact that when that opportunity arrives, there will be no reason for playing out that activity (and awesome motivation not to). I evaluate different ways to deal with taking care of this issue. I foster an iterated variant of toxin story or contend that the case isn't sufficiently taken care of by standard causal decision hypothesis or theory.
The Toxin Puzzle
Kavka's "toxin puzzle" (Kavka 1983) gives a brilliantly confounding issue in theory of the practical rationality. Toxin puzzle, a specialist/agent (we should call her Melian) is drawn closer by an "eccentric billionaire” who is willing to pay Melian $1,000,000 tomorrow first thing if, at 12 PM this evening, she means to drink vial of a specific toxin tomorrow around lunchtime. Drinking that toxin would leave Melian feeling sick for some time, however Melian would happily go through a brief time of nausea in the event that it implied that she would get a huge amount of cash. Sadly for Melian, in any case, in case Kavka is correct she cannot mean to drink the poison (basically not in case she is rational),