Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
You are here: HomeEssayHistory
3 pages/≈825 words
1 Source
English (U.S.)
MS Word
Total cost:
$ 12.15

The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America (Essay Sample)


The task involved a well-regulated militia which insinuated the perception of The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America. the paper talked of individual rights to own a gun in America.


A Well Regulated Militia:
The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America.
The Second Amendment divides Americans concerning gun ownership and to protect the state. It is depicted that the amendment tends to protect the militias interests and individual rights to own guns at large. Saul Cornell's book, A well-regulated Militia, collectively rejects both rights regarding it as a civic right. A civic right in this context is the requirement that citizens of the American state own arms to engage in militia activities. Cornell's perception was right because the Founding Fathers understood that owning guns is neither a collective nor an individual right. The thesis of this context comes at a balance of revolutionary state building incorporating militia, natural rights, and armed people. The overall study shows that natural rights involve the right to own guns for self-protection as agreed over the decades by Americans. Militias come about in the essence of protecting the nation against attacks while armed people were also in play to counter a communist government. Therefore, A well Regulated Militia creates a uni-dimensional traditional structure that creates a map to the current problems over gun ownership.
Armed people in the US are perceived to keep maximum security in government creating a well-regulated militia in a free state. Framers in this context wrote the above strategy of offering free safety to the state and spearheading the right to own guns in a free country. Many Framers view militias as a guaranteed freedom and arms ownership as a form of self-protection at large. A Well Regulated Militia (AWRM) perception on this issue is termed as militia centric, and their goal is to ensure a civic right to arms. Random ownership of guns in America would create numerous forms of malice concerning the guaranteed freedom of every citizen in America. Besides, self-defense would promote a lot of gun violence in the country. It was a bold move by Noah Webster when he wrote, “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed …” The perception in Webster's context created a clear picture to criticize arms ownership and participating in militia activities in most countries.[Cornell, Saul. 2007. "A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origin of Gun Control in America". William & Mary Bill Of Rights Journal 15 (4): 1-48. p 7]
Framers, on the other hand, relate an armed population as an alternative way of keeping the government in check, especially a communist government. Despite AWRM terming it as militia centric, Framers have overlooked the issue to a political value over the centuries and in the future. These two aspects are real ones in nature because in no uncertain terms that one will find the armed populace not involving in militia activities in the essence of keeping the government in check. Militia related issues in a country would doubt the government's powers in controlling its nation and other countries

Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!