Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
You are here: HomeEssayHistory
7 pages/≈1925 words
English (U.S.)
MS Word
Total cost:
$ 25.2

Oppressive nations that host Olympic games (Essay Sample)


Evaluation of historic events that surround Olympic games. The sample is about the contemporary issues that the United States reveals in relation to the nations that host Olympic games. The issue of Germany hosting the games in 1936 and her promotion of Nazi ideologies pops up in this discussion.


All contemporary issues have their own roots from which they evolve. There exist numerous issues whose roots are easily recognizable through exhaustive research. The research methodology that can uncover the roots of a certain contemporary issue should be prospective in nature. The research methodology in this case should not trigger irate emotions from the audience. The key significance of identifying the roots of a contemporary issue is for the sake of illustrating memorable changes and events in history that led to the issue. This implies that, all contemporary issues that are of interest in the public domain have known roots.
It is intuitive to affirm that hosting Olympics is a contemporary issue that is currently debatable in the public domain. Controversy exists between the nations that host Olympics and their protagonists. Most of these protagonists argue that most nations that have so far hosted this commonwealth Olympic Games had their own interests at hand. These countries are known to promulgate their own personal interests by hosting the highly participated games in the world. The current contemporary issues on Olympic Games and their hosts are observable in most nations across the world. Recently, Senator Lindsey Graham surprised the Olympic world when he stated, “The United States should consider boycotting the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics if Russia grants the asylum request of "NSA leaker" Edward Snowden.”  According to the senator, it would be impious for the United States to embrace Russia by attending the Olympic Games. He insisted that he hates what Russia is doing to the world through her oppressive actions. He wondered why Russia could provide asylum to a person who committed treason to the United States. According to him, Russia was taking it to another level. This paper addresses the history of nations that are hosting or have hosted Olympics in the past. According to history, the contemporary issue about the oppression of the nations that host these games started a long time ago. The discussion will link every detail of the current promotion of oppression with the countries who have already hosted the games to promote their own political ideologies.
The Oppressive Nations
Oppression is a social crime that can lead to total war or cold war. Most nations that have ever hosted Olympics have the history of oppression at the time of hosting the games. Additionally, history repeats itself because there are cases relating to the promotion of oppression and hosting the games. Revelations declare that most nations have ill-motives that they are always ready to showcase to the whole world. According to Berg, “The Olympics offer totalitarian or otherwise oppressive governments an opportunity to repurpose the publicity accorded to sport for the benefit of the state and its ideology.”  In Berg’s statement, it is evident that Olympics have ceased to promote sports by bringing together different nations as participants. Contrarily, host nations have turned the main purpose of the games into promoting political ideologies and interests for their benefit. The games provide the best grounds for the host nations to advance their individualistic ideologies. The United States is uprising against the alleged opportunistic nature of the host nations. The debate surrounds the key factors that encourage a certain nation to bid as the host of Olympic Games. Graham’s sentiments are significant in this case to support this contemporary issue. It is evident that the Russian authorities responded to Graham’s allegations by stating that, when not using the army or navy to invade other nations, the United States issue political utterances that are meant to maim a certain nation. The verbal war between the United States and Russia regarding boycotting the 2014 Olympics is an indication of the oppressiveness of the host nations against the attending nations and the whole world.
The contemporary issue has steered verbal exchanges between the United States and Russia regarding Russia’s promotion of atrocities in the world. Russia is accused of going against the United States’ international diplomacy by promoting criminal offenses. According to the United States, Russia is promoting international crimes by protecting criminals who seek asylum in their country. The United States is bound to make diplomatic decisions to solve the controversial issue. According to Graham, boycotting the games would be a big blow to Russian president, Vladmir Putin. It is a threat that he cannot readily ignore because he knows the consequences are dire. Graham even compares the situation where Nazi Germany hosted the games in 1936 in Berlin. He argues that it would be impossible to participate in the games if the hands of the clock go back to that time when Adolf Hitler hosted the games. Hitler’s case is similar to what the United States is sensing with Russia. There are solutions to resolve the issue as the main option of avoiding a repeat of what happened in Germany when she hosted the 1936 Olympic Games.
Olympic Games give oppressive or totalitarian nations opportunities to utilize the highly publicized events as a platform of fostering their ideologies. According to Berg, the Olympic Games held in Russia in the past enabled the nation to set up a gigantic billboard indicating the nation’s superiority in communism. Additionally, Berg state...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!