Describe Cultural Anthropology Among the Anglo-Indians (Essay Sample)

Cultural Anthropology among the Anglo-Indians
Name:
Institution:
Professor:
Date:
Cultural Anthropology among the Anglo Indians
Societies around the world have evidenced different stories that have shaped their present statuses. Precisely, the Anglo-India society herein helps understand the discourse of cultural anthropology. The understanding is that cultural anthropology has seen Anglo-India evolve from one state of behavioral patterns to another over time. Categorically, the Anglo-India empire under the subjection of the British rule expressed their discontent through various forms of rebellion and this was equally shown to them by the ruling authorities. The Anglo-Indians did not subscribe to foreign ruling and as such became rebellious as they pushed for their independence which they currently enjoy. As such, cultural anthropology is the definitive in which a society defies its rule to realize its independence and free will in matters living and political systems. Therefore, this essay seeks to explain cultural anthropology with the use of evidences sourced from the article “Empire, Anglo-India, and the Alimentary Canal.”
The introduction of beef and pork fat greased cartridges for the new Enfield riffles was considered an act of mutiny preparedness that was pertinent to cultural anthropology in the Anglo-Indian setting. The riffles were meant to fight back the English men in defiance of their rule. The English rule had exerted pressure over the Anglo Indians where they had taken the best lands and amassed resources to themselves. Furthermore, they mistreated the Anglo Indians where those who openly rebelled met the wrath of English men through the way of death or torture. An imminent uprising was irresistible among the natives on Indian soil. Resultantly, the public was armed and with means such as having their cartridges greased with fat from either pork or beef to increase the efficiency of their novel Enfield riffles.[Roy, Parama. 2012. "New Routes for Diaspora Studies." Empire, Anglo-India, and the Alimentary Canal, 95-105.]
Consequently, Indian women and children were killed and their bodies thrown into a well which was to be a sign of a mythical symbol of Indian depravity. The ruling authorities thought the best approach to quell the aggression from the Indians would be returning double the force their subjects exerted on them. The fight was intense and led to killing of innocent lives. Orders to kill were given in a bid to frighten the rebelling parties. The result was that women and children lost their lives as collateral damage while the men were in the fields. Deep hatred developed between the ruling party and the Anglo-Indians and this resulted to the reason outlined in the following paragraph.
The English authorities were unimpressed by the growing Anglo-Indian populations as it would lead to a compromised and partisan ruling class. The English men were ordered not to marry Indians and not to engage any relationships that would lead to having children of mixed races. In fact, English women were allowed in India to reduce the case of Anglo-Indian children as well as minimize funds spent on children fathered by the English men. Clearly, this meant the ruling party did not want the widespread of the Anglo-Indian society to remain strong and relevant.
Rumors of widespread rape, torture and sexual humiliation of white girls and women was further an indication of avenging that was going on in the light of mutiny. Brutality became an order of the day especially by the British armies, they would kill people and throw them into wells meant to suppress the aggression from the Indians. Humanitarian concerns were raised but there were no recognized institutions to sort out the mess. The affected parties in the Indian mutiny would cause the English men to reduce their force and after a continuous tag of war, the Anglo Indians would be free. Mutiny indicated a manifestation of utter irrationality. Additionally, it was a sign of their divine appointment to the stunning reminder of a rule that was fragile and vulnerable.
Contaminated foods and itinerant chapatis were also part of the much-spread Indian mutiny. Foods served were meant to weaken either party. In the case of the English men, foods would be given to their subjects to objectively make them ill and weaken them hence reducing their force regarding aggression. Chapatis which were known to be a common food among the Indians would also act as a tool of coercion into cultural anthropology. The English men would intentionally deny the Indian populaces access to raw materials that would help in the making of their foods an act that was not met well by the Indians.
The Anglo-Indians who are arguably a section of the Indians would further get poor treatment from their masters. For instance, women would eat left overs that their English husbands had had. This was to serve as a constant reminder that the women were less valued and would be termed as “garbage” as indicated the article used herein. Workers would further have remains of the let overs that the wives or rather women had. This showed that the Anglo-Indians were unappreciated as this was also meant to deprive them of the food they enjoyed such as chapatis and further spread infections through food to the unwanted people.
The alimentary offenses captured in the London Times were horrific. Children would see their parent’s alimentary canal being cut into pieces. The pieces would then be given to th...