Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssaySocial Sciences
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Level:
Chicago
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.15
Topic:

Alexander Hamilton the Federalists and Thomas Jefferson the Republicans (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

The paper is an anti-federalist essay that entails describing the ideas that Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans had to pertain to economic, social, and political philosophies

source..
Content:


Anti-Federalists Essay:
Alexander Hamilton the Federalists and Thomas Jefferson the Republicans
Name
Institution
Course
The paper is an anti-federalist essay that entails describing the ideas that Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans had to pertain to economic, social, and political philosophies. Comparison of the philosophies of both men is discussed in-depth. Social philosophy is the interpretation that society has on specific study questions. Economic philosophy is the study of rational choice and the appraisal outcomes of the choices. Political philosophy is the study of the questions of nature and the legitimacy of public agents. Hamilton and the Federalists' views, and Jefferson and the republicans on the central government, US economy, French revolution, National bank, and war debt, and other parties had their understanding of what is right and what should be done to make their decisions understood.
Both philosophers had decided to form a national bank, although they had different reasons for it. The differences between the two were that Hamilton and the federalists were made up of well-educated and owned land, while the Republicans were shopkeepers and poor farmers who were illiterate. Hamilton assumed that the elite would have to rule on high voting qualifications and advocated for a powerful central government and a vast republic that would control factions and consider common citizens ignorant and incapable of self-government. Many citizens viewed and supported the motivation of the federalists. Political factions arose when members of the same group had different opinions on the same issues.[Clint Hughes, M.S US Historthttps://youtu.be/zS4zktSb7Eo] [Ibim]
Jefferson preferred state rights; for him an average citizen was capable of self-government and democratic values were correct and that the average he also although they had poor voting skills. Hamilton and the federalists emphasized manufacturing, trade, finance, foreign trade, taxes, and business security. Jefferson and the Republicans wanted a simple agrarian system that was an agricultural economy and supported the Yeoman farmers who were small farmers and not plantation owners. Jefferson wanted the interests of the commoner’s to be addressed by the government. Hamilton despised the social turmoil and brutality that was happening during the French revolution. In contrary Jefferson praised the French revolution. According to him, it is not possible to transform despotism into freedom in a featherbed. Both sides required religious freedom to be their replacements. Jefferson has made attempts to abolish the religious levy.[Clint Hughes, M.S US History] [Speech on Amendments to the Constitution]
Hamilton approved the bank since it was appropriate and proper and made the constitution to approve it. National Banks Hamilton wanted the national bank to be founded and for it to be beneficial to investors by selling some of its stocks to individual citizens. Jefferson argued that the national bank was not approved in the constitution. The government needed to provide a secure place for securing the money and it

...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Public administration Social Sciences Essay Research
    Description: Berlin argued strongly for negative liberty in his Four Essays on Liberty, yet I think a useful tool to understand my issue with negative liberty is John Rawls’s veil of ignorance. Let us take two societies, one based on Berlin’s negative liberty, Society B, and one formed from behind Rawls’s veil...
    5 pages/≈1375 words| 3 Sources | Chicago | Social Sciences | Essay |
  • A Discussion on How Countries can Contribute Towards Ensuring Global Peace
    Description: Every government must ensure the security of people within its borders. Therefore, any responsible government prioritizes global peace by offering support to neutralize terrorism since; no country or individual can claim to be entirely safe. Securing the borders of any nation today comes with a fair share...
    2 pages/≈550 words| 4 Sources | Chicago | Social Sciences | Essay |
  • Pure Land Buddhism and its World View. Social Sciences Essay
    Description: The concept that builds the pure land Buddhism belief dates back to the sixth century where the teachings were first introduced by the Korean emissaries to Japan....
    4 pages/≈1100 words| 2 Sources | Chicago | Social Sciences | Essay |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!