The Post-Vietnam War United States Air Force 1973-1991 (Essay Sample)

THE POST-VIETNAM WAR UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 1973-1991
Name
Class Information
Date
In the cultural change, socio-political, and huge technological change era, it is complex, to predict the future with any level or certainty. To alleviate those uncertainties, military leadership and thinkers as well as defense experts, over the past few years, have focused on innovation, technology, and adaptation, specifically during a period of extensive power completion, but no direct conflict, to attain advantage in the future battles. Among the key, referenced wars by the American military is the post-Vietnam war in the 1970s and is utilized as a case study for present military professionals attempting to comprehend how military institutions organize for future battles. During that period, the American military struggled to understand ways of bridging not only regarded as technology gap, but as an intellectual gap against a noble competitor that seemingly appeared like it possessed all the advantages. The various successes in the war that America has attained from the past wars have offered lessons that are vital to prepare for future war.
A key contentious matter that arose during the post-Vietnam war was the American air force's supposed absence of interest in the CAS or closed air support. The close air support was a debate that had much pressure on the air force that it decided to change. After the battle, the air force overcame that view by dedicating its whole training exercises to the closed air support and inviting the army and Marine Corps to participate. These debates were a blessing in disguise. They aided the air force make changes to their staffing and equipping its staff. The debate forced the then chief staff general to draft a letter to request support in enlightening the American air force. The debate made the air force leader ask for support in having the air force design and develop their aircraft based on the closed air support. The air force was not well equipped and they shared their equipment with the army. Additionally, part of their wing aircraft had been commissioned to the army an aspect that made the training and equipping the air force to have much stress. The stress from sharing the equipment and the aspect that the air force was with less equipment led the chief staff general to commence plans of building their aircraft based on the closed air support. However, the letter stated that if they build the aircraft then the army would contend to be assigned the aircraft.
The air force did not have many pilots and did not have many working as forces before the war. The training conducted and development of aircraft was not an aspect that was well followed before the Vietnam War. However, there were lessons learned after the post-Vietnam war. A lesson from the post-Vietnam war was that during the war one squadron was claimed monthly. A squadron depicts a unit in an air force. With a squadron being claimed monthly, the rate at which the air force was declining was high. That was what led the air force to have a proposal for air-to-air fighters. Additionally, the air force realized that its equipment was never advanced and that the fighter pilots were not adequate. That was what made the American air force commence plans to innovate and develop their equipment that favored and met their demands and requirements. Since the air force was underequipped and understaffed, the debates surrounding them made them embrace research and innovation to build aircraft that suited the air force. Since their aircraft could not in the beginning out power the Vietnam army, the American air force realized that it was better to build an aircraft whose key purpose was air superiority. That has been the driving force of the American air force till today. The air force realized that the capability to outperform all other aircraft was the key thing rather than the capability to detect them first. However, despite them realizing that air superiority was key, the American air force held to the secret that equipment alone was not sufficient. That was what drove them to extra and more training of its staff. Despite it building aircraft that surpassed other nations at that time, they understood that the pilot