EXAMINING MARX’S THEORY OF ALIENATION (Essay Sample)

MARX’S THEORY OF ALIENATION
by [Name]
Course Name
Professor’s Name
Institution Affiliation
City, State
Date
Marx’s Theory of Alienation
Introduction
Karl Marx is termed to be one of the influential and prolific intellects of the 19th century. He fought for the start of classes in the societies that would be controlled through true democracy and equality. In this perspective, he mainly criticized capitalism's system as one of the orders in which some of the most influential organizations and companies have gained considerable power along with clout. Karl Marx argued on these perspectives that workers had been treated as commodities of commercial and materials of trade under the capitalist system. Marx contends that workers have been disillusioned with their work since most of their work is managed by the high-level managers and controllers of the higher hierarchy. Karl Marx believes that human creativity and expressions have been distorted by praising their effectiveness and efficiency. Defensively, the theory of alienation is the core argumentative concept that analyses the difference between capitalism and alienation by Karl Marx.
Firstly, Marx argues that poverty to workers would mean that they cannot make a prosperous condition or change their living state. Capitalism usually achieves a considerable profit to various firms (Marx, 2015). However, it also gives insufficient wages to employees and deplorable working conditions for the workers. In this perspective, Karl believes that alienation made workers more guilty over each other due to the nature of the capitalist system's competitiveness. In capitalism, employees are typically asked to do a particular task against human nature or the working conditions obliged for the workers. These arguments were meant to help workers attain creativity and design what they could use to manage their upcoming challenges.
Secondly, Karl Marx initially argued that separation was a natural and existing outcome of capitalism for various reasons. First, employees are mainly controlled by different capitalist forces to boost output and production as well in the firms (Marx, 2015). The outcome of this is very authentic that employees will tend to lose hope and determination in doing their work. This because capitalists normally fight to make sure that workers' activities are channeled towards a particular goal that directly benefits the firms and favors the firm's development. Therefore, various firms' immediate need is to ensure that employees can achieve tremendous value and attain their objectives and goals.
Thirdly, the workers are termed to be instruments or tools in firms, resulting in the loss of personal identifications as deduced by Karl. The outcomes cause severe frustration and resentment since the production channels are owned privately (Rosa et al., 2017). Another mode of alienation is the hostility of employees from the perspective of the nature of human beings. Human beings are known to produce freely and deliberately potentially. Therefore, freely and mindful production can be the most genuine existence of people. The assumption does not conclude that laborers should be responsible for specific operations in the firm. However, workers can contribute to the production in the firm without a lot of obligations from them.
Fourthly, Karl Marx argued that capitalism's system mainly intends to create an illusion that employees are to be paid for the work which is well done only. In the real sense, the methods which are used by the capitalist to manage employees’ aims to manage them by actually extracting the benefit which is made from the task done by the workers (Shantz et al., 2015). The creation of alienation can result in severe consequences for the whole society. Also, all consumers are as well controlled by offering products to them without the firms' option. The benefits normally obtained from organizations that practice this system of capitalism generally employees very high frustrations. Karl also suggested that the capitalist system motivated repetitive work sequence that has failed to develop any form of value. Therefore, the workers' power has been changed into a commodity that is then diverted into forms of small wages.
Fifthly, Karl Marx argued that people could develop a wide range of thinking by pursuing multiple choices. As a result, humanity entails contemplating the environment and coming up with numerous solutions to various issues (Saito, 2017; Feenberg, 2014). Karl, therefore, concluded that society is made up of a persistent state of change. The social, societal classes start to do away with the existing orders and manipulation of the masses. The consequence of capitalism is that a new class has finally done away with creativity and innovations in society. Thus, the capability of creating resentment may result in a painful experience.
Sixthly, Marx suggested that capitalism finally combines labor by workers to the state of commercial material. The result causes a very high state of alienation and resentment (Saito, 2017; Feenberg, 2014). The system of capitalism's primary structure can result in the deterioration in the social status and relations since employees must fight for rare resources for their survival.
In another perspective on the difference between capitalism and the system of alienation, Karl Marx argued that the primary form of isolation is when employees feel very discouraged with the type of work entitled to them. Marx argued that capitalist societies gave artisans chances to have some loneliness in their various tasks (Nygren & Gidlund, 2016). In the current capitalist, organizations have positions in which employees are managed through controls and some checks. Supervisors seek to develop targets that match organizational policies and ensure that all the organizational policies are achieved.
Karl Marx also suggests that human beings are born to contemplate and capture their surroundings to shape their thoughts. In other words, surroundings help boost creativity, which can solve complex situations (Napoletano et al., 2018). Besides, employees require freedom as it means moving away from the negative structures that constitute social life. Karl believes that the existence of social structures has resulted in a significant impact on individuals by making stringent rules. Therefore, Karl argues that people should be set free to grow per their needs and passion. However, this has been recognized in the capitalist system, thus treating workers as a working tool.
Moreover, Karl Marx argued that workforces are estranged as if they are not humans. In the capitalist economy, employees are known to compete for jobs (Oakley, 2015). The state of competition which exists among organizations brings down the prices of materials intently, and the competition among the employees to get a job. Therefore, it is not the workers who gain from the state of competition. However, capitalists do. The act not only materially affecting the employees but also damages the relationship which exists between the employees as well. Individuals can be categorized as unrestricted beings who can cooperate and make a tremendous sophisticated change in transforming the world.
Moreover, laborers are also isolated from gaining benefits from the products of their effort. The capitalists do not have to perform any firm operations because they own the firm production (Held, 2017). Also, Marx argues that capitalists have the power to control the returns generated from the firms. They also hold huge revenues generated from profits for enrichment. However, they can only generate these profits by making sales on the commodities widely produced by their employees. Therefore, the laborers' products outgrow the investors, whose core benefits are different from those gained by the workers. The workforces only perform capitalists’ task mainly as a channel of income and as consumers: Furthermore, the workers purchase products from capitalists; hence, strengthening capitalists’ position in the market environment and investment sectors. Therefore, Max aligns with the opposition to defend the workers who are treated as unfortunate beings.
Besides, Karl made another argument that employees are alienated from the state of labor. Since capitalist owned the organizations that gives job opportunities to employees, the capitalist is the one that makes decisions on what products to be made and the products which are not to be made. The capitalist also highlights how these products are being made and the working condition state's state (Heller, 2018). Due to the harsh and unconducive working environment for the workers, they tend to work outside the assigned work to fulfill their needs as a source of human freedom and self-definition.
Another aspect of the alienation of workers from Karl Marx's perspective states that workers do not have control over the processes and the products of their products. The reason is that laborers do not own the actual means of production (Marx, 2015). At the same time, workers do not have significant control over each other. The laborers are overused to maximize the output, which, in turn, creates an excellent opportunity for the managers of the firm and the owner to enrich themselves. The workers opt to work in labor unions to facilitate solidarity among themselves and sometimes air their grievances through strikes. However, Marx states that even if the workers go on strike, they must adhere and comply with law enforcement agencies' rules.
According to Marx's theory, he presupposes that individuals in a capitalist society are used in economic times to measure the rate...