Biden (Essay Sample)

Student’s name: Professor’s name: Course Code: Date: Joe Biden Introduction Under President Trump’s regime, the U.S made erratic foreign policy decisions. For instance, the country withdrew from alliances, business partnerships, and treaties advocated by President Obama’s administration. The U.S also denigrated international institutions like the World Health Organization and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). These foreign policy decisions affected the U.S influence and supremacy globally. In response, Biden’s foreign policy approach abandoned Trump’s ideology of “America First” to rebuild positive associations with international institutions and U.S allies globally. Thus, Biden’s foreign policy aims to reform immigration policies, reinstate the Paris climate treaty, repair the damage caused to Iran nuclear agreement, and tame China’s rapid international influence. Biden’s foreign policy also intends to strengthen the U.S and European countries’ collaboration by funding NATO, closing foreign-money loopholes, and toughening their cyberinfrastructure. The Social Context and History of Trump Foreign Policy In 2017, Trump signed an executive order that transformed U.S immigration policies. He demanded border security personnel deny nationals from Muslim-majority countries access to the U.S (Council on Foreign Relations). The executive order also prohibited humanitarian agencies from enrolling refugees seeking asylum from Muslim countries like Syria. Trump’s administration claimed that Muslim immigrants and nationals posed significant threats to U.S national security (Council on Foreign Relations; Restad 11). Trump also banned federal funding of sanctuary cities and directed the money to construct the U.S-Mexico border wall. According to Council on Foreign Relations, sanctuary cities shelter illegal U.S immigrants. In short, Trump’s foreign policy approach discriminated against immigrants and individuals from Muslim-majority countries. In 2017, Trump announced withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. Trump maintained that the Paris climate deal was unfair to U.S interests because it jeopardized the country’s economic growth and development outcomes. Trump also argued that the Paris climate treaty hindered U.S initiatives to address its unemployment problems (Council on Foreign Relations; Restad 10). The agreement also exposed U.S workers to high unemployment rates and lower wages due to the closure of carbon-emitting factories. These assumptions contributed to the U.S withdrawal from the Paris climate treaty during Trump’s leadership regime. In 2017, Trump revisited the Iran nuclear deal. According to Trump’s administration, the Iran nuclear deal constituted numerous flaws that posed significant threats to U.S supremacy. For example, the Iran nuclear accord did not prevent Iran from creating nuclear weapons (Kroineg 2). Moreover, it created suitable platforms for Iran to embrace nuclear-weapon programs in the future. Thus, the Iran nuclear agreement undermined the U.S’s global non-proliferation policy and interests in the Middle East. Trump also acknowledged that the Iran nuclear accord lifted sanctions imposed on the Iranian economy. The idea creates a conducive environment for Iran to boost its economic growth and development outcomes. Kroineg claims that a well-developed economy will make Iran resistant to future U.S financial pressure (3). Also, foreign firms will decline to end ties with Iran due to substantial economic benefits. Lastly, the Iran nuclear deal makes it difficult for the U.S to build domestic support or international military actions against Iran when the accord ends. In short, the Iran nuclear deal threatens U.S supremacy and interests in Middle East countries. Cabinet Officers Involved in Biden’s Foreign Policy Formulation? Anthony Blinken, the U.S secretary of state, was deeply involved in Biden’s foreign policy formulation. According to Levingston, Blinken is Biden’s longtime adviser. He served Biden as a senator and White House national security adviser. Blinken also served as the deputy security advisor and deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration. Moreover, Blinken is a steadfast supporter of establishing positive diplomatic relationships. In 2016, Blinken said that “the world is safer for the American people when we have friends, partners, and allies (Levingston).” Therefore, Blinken engaged in Biden’s foreign policy formulation. Alejandro Mayorkas, Avril Haines, and General Lloyd Austin also engaged in Biden’s foreign policy. General Austin is the U.S defense secretary and served the U.S army for 41 years. Avril Haines is the U.S national intelligence director. She served the U.S as deputy national security adviser and deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency under the Obama administration (Levingston). Alejandro Mayorkas is the U.S Department of Homeland Security head. He also served under the Obama regime as deputy secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Congress Involvement The senate’s foreign relations and Homeland government affairs committees participated in Biden’s foreign policy formulation. Congress.Gov debates that the U.S senate’s foreign relations and Homeland government affairs committees hold hearings on specific bill proposals and policy issues. Moreover, they adopt the markup procedures to develop and consider the proposed legislation. The United State Senate notes that the markup procedure empowers the senate foreign relations and Homeland government affairs committees to recommend changes on the proposed legislation to Congress House for better decision-making. Therefore, the Senate foreign relations and Homeland government affairs committees participated in Biden’s foreign policy formulation for better outcomes. The foreign relations and Homeland government affairs chairs participated in Biden’s policy formulation. Congress.Gov assert that the Homeland government affair chair ensure formulated policies strengthens the country’s security. As a result, they eliminate legislation that poses significant threats to U.S national security. In contrast, the foreign relations chair ensures advocated foreign policies address primary issues like war, world affairs, economy, and security (United States Senate). Therefore, Homeland government affairs and senate foreign relations chairs enhance appropriate U.S foreign policies development. Which Interest Groups Will Be Involved? Democrats and most adult U.S citizens support Biden’s foreign policy agendas. These individuals claim that appropriate foreign policies enhance U.S supremacy and influence globally. In addition, Democrats and Adults citizens assert that the U.S benefits immensely from international institutions like NATO and WHO (Pew Research Center). In brief, adult Americans and democrats support Biden’s foreign policy initiatives. On the contrary, most Republicans oppose Biden’s foreign policy initiatives. They argue that Biden’s fore...