Degrowth as a Critique of the Ideology and Notion of Economic Growth (Essay Sample)

Student Name
Professor Name
Course
Date
Degrowth
As a critique of the ideology and notion of economic growth, the terminology "degrowth" has evolved among heterodox and ecological schools of economics. Degrowth advocates for economic contraction by lowering consumption and output and claiming it may be done without reducing well-being and wealth. With Degrowth, there may be a comeback of political variety of environmentalism and a radical theoretical framework, known as "ecologism," among the degrowth group, based on the essential assumption that "growth limitations" exist and must exist. While Degrowth is an ancient concept, Kallis Giorgos's degrowth book has given it a fresh life by bringing together many schools and disciplines of thought to formulate its key recommendations and critiques. This essay aims to examine why Degrowth is necessary for human civilization to continue. The book depicts an outline of the fundamental principles of Degrowth, an interdisciplinary theory or science of ecologism. It situates Degrowth firmly within the discipline of ecological economics and, in addition to explaining its fundamental concepts, investigates what it would take for an economy to move to a position where it could thrive without growth for human civilization to continue.
The concept is important because growth is institutional, discursive, and political but also physiological. Energy, resources, and matter are converted into commodities, services, and trash in the economic process (Giorgos 39). In principle, increasing resource efficiency in manufacturing might separate material throughput from economic output. However, ecological economist Kallis Giorgos contend that, while relative decoupling is widespread, total decoupling is improbable in practice (Giorgos 104). The concept is also important because the further effectively people use resources, the less they cost; thus, people end up utilizing more of them, which is what growth is all about.
Increasing labor productivity brings gains in resource productivity, which leads to creating new jobs and increased production, not decreased employment. Capitalist economies expand by making more intense use of people and resources. Accelerating the process is unlikely to save money (Giorgos 135). By