A Feedback On The Idea Of Scottish Loch Ness Monster Existence (Essay Sample)
The paper was written in JulyAugust. The task was to analyze two sources about monsters and provide a feedback on them. There were no detailed comments from the customer. I have chosen the topic of the Loch Ness Monster and, as a result, received a good feedback from the customer and some tips. Mla was the preferred style.source..
Over a great period, people have shown great interest regarding the idea of Scottish Loch Ness Monster existence. While specialists conduct a lot of the researches in this field of interest, few to now proofs remain whether the lake beast subsists. Among the factors bringing controversial results are the false testimonies, advertising aims, geographical structure of Scotland and specifically its Highlands. Although researchers use sonars and other technologies, they are not able to give distinctive answers as to the Nessie theory. People's fears and mythological beliefs also bring misunderstanding. Therefore, at present, it is impossible to clearly state the Loch Ness Monster really exists.
When stories about the Loch Ness Monster appear in mass media, one should apply logic to analyze the data and motives which people use to prove the existence of the mentioned creature. According to Bauer, eyewitnesses of the beast subsistence mostly cannot be helpful for science but are serious facts to consider because independent observers and policemen collect them and propose to the public (234). The people who claimed they have seen the creature had similar testimonies describing Nessie's color of skin and body proportions. Nevertheless, as Bauer states, the witnesses, for example sometimes could not distinguish whether they saw a boat or a real animal (234). Meanwhile, Moir explains these testimonies possess mostly one aim of attracting tourists to the Highlands of Scotland. Keeping in mind most individuals who hunt for the evidence of the beast existence are not scientists one cannot trust their words. Moreover, one of the reasons they involve themselves into the searches is to attract public's attention. Therefore, although eyewitnesses can be helpful to investigate whether the Loch Ness Monster exists, most of them are not professionals or possess wrong motives.
Further, it is needful to look at the current investigation results from the scientific perspective. Bauer argues about a large amount of data proving the water monster really exists. As an example, the author proposes to consider the growing interest to Nessie beginning from 1930 and the appearance of the Dinsdale's film shot in 1961 (Bauer 226). Bauer notes several details prove the object in the mentioned film is very likely to be something different from a boat: supporters of the Nessie's existence claim a boat leaves bow-waves and trails that its propeller leaves, while the captured object in the film leaves only the bow-waves (229). However, according to Moir, after the film release a book which offered a portion of skepticism concerning this issue and stating the creature everyone claimed to have been the Loch Ness Monster was just a hoax or some other animal appeared (17). While the Dinsdale's recorded visual material is the most popular testimony helping to doubt the skeptic views of its observers, there is still a lack of undoubtable scientific support, serious proofs and the absence of dualistic variations of its interpretation.
Still, there have been even more attempts to prove the existence of Nessie and this time it acquired a form of sonar scans. As Bauer notes, sonar is a technology which find objects in the water collecting the echoes of the sound waves which these objects produce (230). Nevertheless, the mentioned technology cannot give proper results when somebody needs to find out the objects shape and size; what is more, it does not work effectively with the fact-moving objects (Bauer 230). The author