Case Of Mary Barnett (Essay Sample)

Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Case Of Mary Barnett Mary Barnett is the subject of the lawsuit. She left her six-month-old child in a Chicago apartment so she could see her fiancée in California. After a week, she came back and discovered that the infant had passed away from dehydration (Chaffee 65). I determine that her conduct of leaving the kid alone was not deliberate after taking into consideration her situation and the statements of the witnesses. Alison's mother was found not guilty of the baby's second-degree murder. Caroline Hospers' testimony, in my view, is untrustworthy and slanted towards the defendant. Seeing her in the hallway, she claimed to have found that "the accused had left poor little Alison all alone to die" when she observed the officers (Chaffee 66). In other words, the only proof the witness had indicating the defendant had meant to murder someone was the cops' presence at the scene. The onlooker applies hindsight bias to believe that the perpetrator premeditated her action of leaving the kid. In judicial situations, this circumstance happens when someone simply exploits the evidence in the public domain to establish that their penalty was unfair (Roese and Kathleen 411). The prosecution's witness was prejudiced, and the statistics she gave was likewise slanted. Hospers also allude to the defendant's lifestyle of partying and the lack of "a steady partner" as proof of her purposeful neglect (Chaffee 66). Such facts are mainly unimportant in showing the accused's culpability for the intended murder. The lack of a stable guy and the presence of wine and whiskey bottles in Barnett's rubbish was no indicators of carelessness or even of a premeditated homicide. Additionally, the witness' allegations that Barnett came to California "just to party and have a good time" were conjectures (Chaffee 67). Additionally, she could not give actual data to back her assertions that the "baby was not taken care of appropriately" (Chaffee 67). As a consequence, I assume that her testimony was prompted by unfavorable sentiments and maybe even envy of the defendant. In light of the defendant's admission, it's evident from the officer's testimony that she knew exactly what she did wasn't supposed to be doing. Defendant confessed to authorities that she had no urgent intentions to return after leaving the child alone with no one to watch after him. Getting to California was her top priority, and she meant to do it "at whatever cost." She also acknowledged as much. A mother's desire to reach California "at any cost" may have negatively affected her motherly responsibilities. She was on the run from Tim, desperate for his assistance in caring for the baby. It's possible that Barnett made the decision to go to California despite the high costs since she didn't have anybody else to help with the kids. Dr. Parker's allegations that Barnett was competent to stand trial were credible from a professional viewpoint. Remorse and guilt were to blame for the defendant's despair, according to him. That day she left her kid, the defendant's doctor said that she was in excellent health. In addition, it is strange that the expert asserted these findings on January 23 without offering any evidence of the defendant's mental condition. In my opinion, the doctors' claims that Barnett was insane were prejudiced and aimed to condemn the defendant unfairly. In addition, he overlooked the fact that the death of a child might be quite upsetting to the average individual. Alice Jones, a member of the defense team, testified that she had known the accused for eight years. There is enough time to get to know a person's personality in eight years, in my opinion. In my judgment, her testimony is critical to the outcome of the case. Being a mother herself, she could empathize with the defendant's situation. Her despair may have been exacerbated by Tim's claimed poor connection with her. Despite the fact that Jones may not have shown much preference for her long-time buddy, the evidence she provided demonstrates that the defendant was obsessed with asking the one person who could help her. He leaned on his medical training to provide a convincing testimony for the defense like Mr. Bloom did.According to his perspective, the defendant's mental disorder rendered her unable to stand trial. He was knowledgeable about post-natal disorders, which may lead ...