Laws of Wars are Critical in Creating Rationality (Essay Sample)
The task involved Reflection that described what was discussed in the lecture. The Reflection required a response to the ICRC’S article 1; there are 4 Hague regulations for establishing someone as a combatant, which is (1) to be commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates, (2) to have a fixed distinctive emblem recognizable at a distance, (3) to carry arms openly, and (4) to conduct their operations per the laws and customs of war. It also required a response on Direct Participation in Hostilities (DPH) and Civilian Combat Function (CCF), among other issues in the lecture provided by the professor.
source..Laws of Wars are Critical in Creating Rationality
Laws of wars are critical in creating rationality among participants in a battle or conflict because they enforce rationality to inhibit adverse casualties during the war. Even though rogue countries can sometimes violate these laws, they serve a greater purpose in limiting mortalities from hostilities or wars than if there were no regulations or laws. It is difficult to stop wars completely, making it vital to regulating international conflicts to mitigate unwarranted death of civilians during combat operations.
The battlefield concept was critical in helping me understand the significance of limiting participants on the battlefield and the differentiation between civilians and combatants. The battlefield theory emphasizes who qualifies as a target and not one, helping create a buffer against attacking civilians during conflicts. As part of the lecture materials, the article effectively highlights the four Hague principles for determining a person who qualifies as a combatant. The "direct participation in hostilities” framework recognizes how to differentiate a civilian from a combatant. The participants in every conflict often look for opportunities and tactics to overwhelm their opponents, albeit by applying unorthodox techniques like using human shields. Civilian victimization by terrorists or non-state actors involves capturing civilians and using them as human shields against offensive attacks (Sullivan & Johannes 2209).
Other Topics:
- The Judicial Branch's ResponsibilityDescription: The judicial branch's responsibility is to provide interpretations of the laws. In contrast, the legislative and executive branches are responsible for enacting new laws and ensuring they are followed. To argue that judges decide cases based on their policy preferences rather than a faithful interpretation ...4 pages/≈1100 words| 2 Sources | MLA | Law | Essay |
- Probable Cause and Reasonable SuspicionDescription: The law requires that "Probable Cause" exists before a judge approves a request for a search warrant; however, people may be stopped and frisked based on a "Reasonable Suspicion." Please explain in detail why you agree or disagree that these are appropriate standards. I agree that "Probable Cause" and...1 page/≈275 words| 4 Sources | MLA | Law | Essay |
- Legal Problem Question: Damages for Death from a Car HitDescription: Under the Umbrella of US civil law, a death suit can be brought against an identifiable defendant and such suits are the counterpart to criminal charges. In US tort law, negligence is defined as such acts which in similar circumstances, a person having ordinary prudence would not have committed. To prove...2 pages/≈550 words| 5 Sources | MLA | Law | Essay |