Ethical Perspectives of Cloning (Essay Sample)

Student’s name
Instructor’s name
Ethics
Date
Ethical Perspectives of Cloning
Technology innovation has broadened the scope on the actual possibilities of the unknown. Debate on cloning has been strife since the introduction of Dolly, a cloned sheep. Ethical perspectives are moral concerns highlighting right and wrong actions (Knoppers and Ruth 10). Cloning is the regeneration of genes to create an identical living thing (Marks 191). The development has enhanced constructive amongst distinguished scientists. However, the US and UNESCO have banned cloning in humans, based on the moral application of the technology. The essay evaluates the ethical perspectives raised on the subject of cloning people and animals.
Religious Concerns
Religious globally are against cloning of humans. However, varied religious opinions exist on the cloning of animals. The Catholic Church strongly opposes human cloning on account that creation is the prerogative of God. Similarly, Islamic guidelines consider human cloning as unlawful. Moreover, the Jewish community believes creation is supreme and a prerogative of God. However, therapeutic cloning is gaining support amongst religious groupings as a curable solution to incurable diseases. Religious groupings are against the treatment of embryo as commodities unlike living things (Sandel 100). Pope Benedict XVI issued guidelines banning human cloning in response to bioethicists’ calls for funding of research for human cloning. Consequently, religious groupings consider cloning morally wrong and unacceptable.
Emotional Hazards and Relationships
Scientists admit that future relations between clones and human beings will be inhumane and emotionally unacceptable. Confusion exists as to the classifications of a clone from parents as either a child or a sibling to one of the spouses. Furthermore, the sexual association between the clone and either spouse may result in unacceptable relations. Moreover, concerns are rife on the actual treatment clones in the society (Roeser 108). Human rights activists entirely oppose human clones on the basis of the balance of freedoms amongst individuals. Furthermore, ethical fears on the administration of the genetic composition of clones disguising cloning of people as unethical. Therefore, unacceptable relationships and emotional threats outweigh consideration for the actual cloning of human beings.
Disastrous Results
Scientists are alarmed at the high rate of failure in experiments relating to human cloning. Ethical considerations befit moral obligations on doctors on a patient’s treatment. Previous experiments from animal cloning have resulted in deformities, disorders and unexplained genetic aging in newborns. Reports indicate infant animal clones die immaturely after on account of different deformities (Kass 130). Moreover, cloned fetuses are difficult to establish deformities until after birth reducing the chances of successful cloning of animals. Inadequate guarantees for human cloning are clear indications that human cloning is unreliable. Consequently, the unreliability of the technology confirms human cloning is morally wrong.
Medicinal Benefits
Medicinal benefits of therapeutic cloning have significantly swayed public debate on the advantages of human cloning. Scientists believe human cloning could result in the production of genetically unique genes for the manufacture of tissues, engineered treatment and organic transplants. Scientists’ belief therapeutic engineering could lead to treatments for ailments such as Parkinson and Alzheimer (Atala 20). Genetic advancement from animal clones has resulted in better breeds and highly immune animals against infections. Reports indicate cloning could lead to effortless genetic assessment and earlier curative methods for diseases such as Tay-Sachs, spinal twine wounds, and melanoma. Consequently, disregarding medical benefits of therapeutic cloning is irrational of new advancements.
Conclusively, ethical perspectives are naturally varied glo...