Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssaySocial Sciences
Pages:
6 pages/≈3300 words
Sources:
Level:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 39.95
Topic:

Unit 8 - Final exam (Socrates) (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

Explain, clarify, and assess each one of the below points related below to Socrates’ philosophy (Unit 8)1. For Socrates, the search for wisdom begins with an attempt to gain clarity as to who we truly are as human beings. Before we can presume to understand the world, we must begin by understanding the reality of our own consciousness. From a Socratic point of view, the world is reduced exclusively to the human world, everything else being inconsequential. Initially, the search for wisdom is understood in terms of my need to understand precisely who I am.
2. The self—that is, who I am—is primarily revealed in those aspects of my existence that involve conscious choices. I am what and who I am in so far as I choose to be and do what I am and do. This involves moral and ethical choices—what I choose because of my sense of moral or ethical obligation. Consequently, the Socratic search is concentrated in the moral dimension of my existence, which is what Socrates regarded as the true reality of the person.
3. It is obvious, however, that this dimension does not involve my self in isolation. Moral choices involve other selves, other persons, just as theirs involve me. Thus, the search for my self, for my true identity, must be undertaken as a joint effort in which others are as involved as I am. Philosophy must be understood as a social function.
4. The primary mode of human companionship, according to Socrates, is language because language is the framework of rationality, and it is in and through language that we construct the human reality in which we live and function. In a sense, then, to speak is to create.
Accordingly, the Socratic search for the self assumes initially the form of a linguistic analysis in which moral or ethical terms can be subjected to a detailed examination.
5. The linguistic analysis that we encounter in Socrates takes on the form of a dialogue in which the correct definition or understanding of a moral term is sought. Thus, without pretending to know or teach anything, Socrates asks others to define terms such as virtue, happiness, righteousness, the good life, truthfulness, and others.
6. The Socratic dialogue is generally known as the elenchus, a term that conveys the idea of interrogation. In the elenchus, Socrates forces his interlocutor to examine his own understanding of a moral term, that is, to give a clear and concise definition of it. Invariably, however, he forces his interlocutor to confess that his own understanding of the moral term is unclear and unacceptable, and that he really does not know what he is talking about. He is ignorant and his language does not mean anything at all. He utters sounds that say nothing.
7. For his part, Socrates claims to be ignorant himself and insists that he only knows that he knows little or nothing. He does so because he knows that people do not really learn from what 
others say to them, but from what they themselves are able to think and conceive by themselves. Learned knowledge is superficial and mostly useless, whereas knowledge that comes from ourselves is genuine and lasting.
8. The root of all human evil and unhappiness, whether personal, social, or political, according to Socrates, is ignorance, understood not in terms of not having in memory bits of information about the world, but in terms of intellectual or spiritual confusion. We do wrong when we are confused or bewildered, when our ideas are unclear, when the noise and chatter of the human world around us has succeeded in making us stupid (using this word in its etymological sense). Hence, stupid people are bound to be evil and unhappy, and are bound to spread their evil and unhappiness in every direction.
9. This idea is expressed by Socrates in statements such as these: “Those who really know what is good can only do the good,” “Happiness and goodness can only be attained through self-examination and by attaining mental clarity,” “Evil is the necessary result of ignorance.”
10. This Socratic stance reveals a great deal of intellectual optimism, that is, the conviction that the mind, when sufficiently cleansed from the linguistic nonsense that comes from society, traditions, emotions, superstitions, and so many and varied sources of confusion, can reach a level of clarity which makes virtue, goodness, and happiness possible.

source..
Content:
Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Unit 8 - Final exam (Socrates)
Socrates is one of the greatest philosophers ever lived on earth. From one of his famous arguments that the unexamined life is not worth living we find how Socrates is intelligent and philosophical in his thinking. Socrates believes that the search for wisdom begins with an attempt to gain clarity as to who we truly are (Socrates, 161). This statement is true in it’s entirely. People search for wisdom once they have realized their potential and self. You cannot seek something that you do not know. In addition, people seek different kind of wisdom in life. In addition Socrates explains that we can only presume to understand the world if only we begin by understanding the reality of own consciousness. Socrates understood that our own consciousness plays a significant role in what we do in our daily lives. It is also good to understand that people understand things around them when they question their conscience and try to prove their consciousness wrong or true. By understanding the reality of our consciousness we can, therefore, step forward and try to understand what is around us and the entire world in particular. Everything around us is always synthesized by our minds. We imagine everything in our world and the understanding of things around us starts with the understanding of our consciousness. We also think and convert everything in our minds to fit the human context. This means that the world in particular is reduced into a human world. As initially thought, the search of wisdom is understood in terms of our need to understand who we are. Socrates believed that any person in this world must seek knowledge before anything else. Through knowledge Socrates defined ethics and morals. Although some people accused Socrates of ethical nihilism, Socrates questioned what people defined as ethics. People had different definitions of ethics which differed from the true definition of ethics.
Socrates concentrated much on the self and how understanding of one self, contributed much to their personal development. For Socrates, the self (who I am) controls one’s existence. Socrates believed “I am who I am because I choose to be and do what I am and do” (Warnek, 19). In normal circumstances; nobody can influence who you are and what you do especially on our moral and ethical choices. Our choice and sense of moral and ethical values are because of our choice. Socrates believed this because he was a religious man. He believed that what we choose as ethical or morally upright is only based on our senses. For instance, in The Trial of Socrates we find out how Socrates engages Euthyphro on various questions on piety (Plato 37). He shows how people have different definitions of piety. There is no particular definition of piety. It is only through what we do and who we are that we define piety. However, through our varied religions like Christianity we can define piety in a different way. However, this still leaves people with a choice to do what is right or wrong although there are set moral and ethical values in religion, culture or law. As stated by Socrates, the reality of a person is evident by what moral dimension he /she take. What somebody does defines the person. It is what a person believes. Every person has some form of an eternal self, that determines their choices and hence their destiny. Our self-thoughts often lead to our actions. In addition, person’s deeds are normally associated with their habits that define their morality. Our knowledge is a reflection of our consciousness. Our activities are shaped by understanding and, therefore, it is easy to define a person by their ethical or moral choices. The existence of a person also depends on their choice of ethics and moral values. Socrates seems to understand his self. This is the reason that made him face trial and eventually being subjected to death. He had a good opportunity to escape, but he refused since he had a good understanding of his self and principles. For Socrates self-knowledge was vital for good life. He believed that once a person identifies the self, he would gain knowledge that defines virtues.
Philosophy is a social function. It is good to understand that in the process of understanding one’s self people often look at what other people around them are doing. The moral dimension is shaped by other people in the surrounding. The moral choice is sometimes shaped by other selves. It does not occur in isolation since other selves also may forces choices by laws, culture religion or traditions. Therefore, as a person continues to search for their self and true identity, they must follow the joint effort of other selves. Socrates shows this during his trial whereby he is accused by the Greek jury about his teachings. Socrates choice of moral and ethical values is influenced by people who did not like his arguments. Although Socrates remained firm about his teachings, other people were made to follow what the Greek gods said and what other people in the society chose the moral choices in Socrates context was determined by other selves. The search for the true identity of Socrates was a joint effort in which Socrates conquered by death. The moral choices must be understood to depend on other people surrounding us. Socrates shows this through his trial when he is accused of impiety and asebeia. In The Clouds, Aristophanes portrays Socrates a sophist who taught young people values that were not considered ethical in the society. However, through the self-understanding, Socrates teaches the young people how to defend only their “good” actions (Aristophanes, 23). The other selves in the society sometimes determine how people act, but we should hold firm to our understanding of virtues around us.
Language is not only used for communication or speaking but also for acting. In every activity, we do we always speak to ourselves and agree on what to do. Therefore, in every activity one does, he usually has a companion that is one's language. From the Socratic search of one ‘self we are able to find out how important language is in analyzing what is moral or ethical. In order to do what is ethically good or morally good, we need to define the two terms first. As seen in the Socratic conversion between Socrates and Euthyphro in, we see how language is a key factor in understanding one’s self. For instance, Socrates asks Euthyphro what piety is. In his answer, Euthyphro says that piety is doing what is good. In his understanding, however, what is good is doing what pleases the gods. Socrates challenges this by reminding him that gods do different things that sometimes are opposite of each other. In fact gods even fight amongst themselves. What one god considers is good; the other gods considers it bad. It is, therefore, not certain to say that all that is done by gods is good or piety in that matter. In this conversation, we see how language is a creating a significant argument about moral and ethical terms. Language forms a framework of rationality where somebody understands the self. It is the primary mode of human companionship since it describes everything in terms of morals and ethics accordingly.
Every person lives and does activities basing on the understanding of their languages. It is the language that simply defines human activity. In order for one to define the self, he must have a language that he /she identify with. Through the language, we define and identify what we want and act or do it. Socrates knew that people may be taught about justice and various principles. Therefore as Socrates suggests, the self, starts squarely by linguistic analysis of the moral terms. These moral terms must, however, be subjected to detailed examination before we act. Failure to understand our language can lead to people acting in ethically or morally wrong activities.
In the detailed linguistic determination of moral and ethical terms Socrates used a witty approach in finding how people defined several things. He engaged people in dialogue in trying to find the correct definition of moral or ethical term. In this dialogue, Socrates pretended to know nothing about the term in question. He asked people various questions about virtues, good life, happiness, righteousness and truthfulness. Socrates was the father of the modern-day Socratic Method that engages people in a dialogue that tries to find answers by engaging the person who thinks he knows much about the subject, but later will prove him to be wrong. As seen in conversations with Plato, Xenophon and Euthyphro, Socrates conversations revolved around finding the true nature of the term used and the how the word is used in a conversation. Through these dialogues, Socrates used ambiguities and irony in making the person under question appear more knowledgeable about the subject matter than him. In most instances, Socrates claimed to have no knowledge of some of the subjects in question. In particular those that touched in matters of the Greek’s justice system. Socrates looked for particular answers that touched on a particular subject. His question often led to another question that was more advanced in defining the subject in the dialogue. In some of the linguistic analysis, Socrates seemed to ask a question that seems to have simple answers, but which later turns out to be complicated. However, in most of this analysis the person in the dialogue agrees that that there is no clear answer about the question. Socrates used creativity in the question that discarded some of the ideas in question and left people to think different dimension than before. This is was the basis of Socrates trial in court.
Elenchus is the word given to the Socratic dialogue or method of questioning things (Hans 15). It is an interrogation that leaves the interlocutor t...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Entre Nos
    Description: Differences between Entre Nos (Between Us: Paola Mendoza and Gloria La Morte, 2009) Social Sciences Essay...
    3 pages/≈825 words| MLA | Social Sciences | Essay |
  • there is no hope for a perfect research
    Description: there is no hope for a perfect research Social Sciences Essay...
    2 pages/≈550 words| MLA | Social Sciences | Essay |
  • American Government (Bureaucracy)
    Description: The essay discusses bureaucracy and its relation to the presidency, the congress and federal courts - Social Sciences Essay...
    1 page/≈275 words| MLA | Social Sciences | Essay |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!