3 pages/≈825 words
Horizontally challenged people shouldn't pay for two seats (Essay Sample)
Identify and objectify the difficulties encountered by horizontally challenged individuals as well as the airline's policies that forces them to seek alternative methods of travel. source..
Horizontally Challenged People Shouldn’t Pay For 2 Seats (Name) (Date) Horizontally Challenged People Shouldn’t Pay For 2 Seats Introduction Stigmatizing people based on their physical appearance is a negative social bias Horizontally Challenged People Shouldn’t Pay For 2 Seats Objectifying the Rants To Pay or Not to Pay? Conclusion Introduction The twenty first century has, at the very least, been one of the most significant phases of human evolution. From country to country and continent to continent, the enlightened have developed new techniques of dealing with everyday issues, the most pertinent of them being transportation. Indeed, the need to bridge great distances has and continues to fuel the uptake of faster mediums of travel worldwide. Nevertheless, this advancement has also introduced a plethora of issues most of which occur within the confines of the social realm. Pursuant to the major effectors of this development, the principal requirement necessary for an individual to comfortably navigate his or her way in the twenty first century is portability (Oard 78). Consequently, influential industries such as the digital and print media have proliferated the notion that being slim is all but a basic requirement. As such, horizontally challenged people have and continue to find themselves at the receiving end of any travel related dispute. However, it is critical to realize that stigmatizing people based on their physical appearance is a negative social bias. Horizontally Challenged People Shouldn’t Pay For 2 Seats Nowadays, transportation is all about safety and coziness. A passenger needs to feel assured that when he or she boards a plane, the flight will be safe and above all else, cozy. In the year 2009, a flight attendant took a picture of a horizontally challenged passenger occupying an aisle seat. According to the attendant’s deduction, the passenger was a flight risk. In the same year, the United Airlines asserted that such individuals would have to buy two seats, failure to which they would not be allowed to board the plane. The basis of the aforementioned assertion, according to United Airlines, stemmed from the fact that they had received over seven hundred complaints from passengers about having to seat next to a horizontally challenged person. For many disgruntled passengers, this was a welcome decision. Conversely, a large number of politically correct and morally upright people were of the opinion that United Airlines’ decision was geared towards halting the gains made by the fight against discrimination. The so called ‘two seats for fat people’ policy is the major bone of contention between airlines and horizontally challenged individuals (Hunter 58). Objectifying the Rants In the year 2013, Rich Wisken sent a compliant letter to an Australian airline complaining of being ‘forced’ to seat beside a man the size of a nursling hippopotamus. Within no time, Wisken’s fiery worded epistle went viral. Perhaps, what really irked Wisken was the fact that he had paid a superfluous $A25 for an egress column seat. Consequently, Mr. Wisken, just like any other paying passenger, expected to get value for his money. However, as it turned out, this did not happen. The principal question that can deduced from this scenario is; was Wisken’s rant really warranted? The answer to the above question could be yes or no depending on one’s point of view. For those that treasure comfort and the power of money, the answer would be a firm yes. However, for those who consider themselves accommodative and staunch believers in the ideals of humanity, then the answer would definitely be a resolved no. Nevertheless, this does not mean that Mr. Wisken was not supposed to feel offended, after all, each person is entitled to his or her own opinion. Then again, it is not okay to lend voice to one’s thoughts and opinions without considering their potential effects. To Pay or Not to Pay? Horizontally challenged passengers should not be forced to pay for two seats. The reason behind this statement is quite straightforward, that is, doing so is not right. The ‘two seats for fat people policy’ is not only discriminating but also degrading. Nowadays, most of the horizontally challenged people did not have a choice in the matter. In most cases, ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
- Ecotourism in Beijing, ChinaDescription: Beijing is the most familiar travel destination and center for the nation’s economic, political, communication, educational, cultural and international trade being the capital of China people’s Republic...12 pages/≈3300 words| MLA | Tourism | Essay |
- A preliminary analysis of a South Florida urban research site.Description: A preliminary analysis of a South Florida urban research site. Tourism Essay (Undergraduate level)...6 pages/≈1650 words| MLA | Tourism | Essay |
- Does Tourism Benefit a Country?Description: Many countries, organizations, individuals among other stakeholders term tourism as a big business...1 page/≈275 words| MLA | Tourism | Essay |