Essay Available:
You are here: Home → Other (Not Listed) → Law
Pages:
4 pages/≈2200 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 34.56
Topic:
A Foundation of Constitutional Transformation (Other (Not Listed) Sample)
Instructions:
The Bill of Rights had several critical limitations to monarchical power, but two of them proved to be efficient. The first concern is the form of words that makes it clear that the monarch cannot suspend or operate laws without the approval of Parliament. This helped to ensure that no later king or queen would have the right to change or ignore laws at his or her discretion, thus putting the power in the hands of Parliament source..
Content:
A Foundation of Constitutional Transformation
Author
Course
Instructor
Due date
A Foundation of Constitutional Transformation
Question 1
From James II to William and Mary- Rationalizing the Coup d’état of a Monarch
The Bill of Rights of 1689 rationalizes the deposition of James II by pointing at his reluctance to conform to English laws and freedoms. King James II tried to reign like an absolute monarch without the support of the Parliament. He implemented policies that met the king's personal interests, such as religious predilection as well as the imposition of illegal levying of taxes (Dickinson, 2024). In doing so, he transformed parliamentary power by overruling and prioritizing his personal and appointed figurehead interests over the nation's stability. The document says that William and Mary ascended to the throne as invited in order to bring back the legal authority to the nation. This was done in order to justify their deeds not as a coup but as a protection against royal tyranny, which James II provided to neutralize the rights and privileges they were to restore. Thus, the Glorious Revolution was not just a revolution of power or regime change but rather a recreation of a new legitimate government for proper governance of the country.
Question 2
The Most Effective Power-Limiting Restrictions
The Bill of Rights had several critical limitations to monarchical power, but two of them proved to be efficient. The first concern is the form of words that makes it clear that the monarch cannot suspend or operate laws without the approval of Parliament. This helped to ensure that no later king or queen would have the right to change or ignore laws at his or her discretion, thus putting the power in the hands of Parliament (Lemarchand, 2024). The second was that there was no provision for keeping a standing army during times of peace without the consent of the Parliament. This measure not only restricted the monarch in excluding the use of military force as a means of pressure but also put the necessary checks on the despotism powers. These restrictions were the basis for the constitutional monarchy, thus eliminating any possibility of a return to absolutist rule.
Question 3
Comparison in today’s law
Some of the rights mentioned in the 1689 Bill of Rights had a great influence on American law, particularly t...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Other Topics:
- Emergency Response PlansDescription: Emergency Response Plans Law Other (Not Listed)...4 pages/≈1100 words| 3 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
- Gideon V. Wainwright Case BriefDescription: Gideon V. Wainwright Case Brief Law Other (Not Listed)...2 pages/≈550 words| 2 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
- Unintentional Tort Research Summary AssignmentDescription: Unintentional Tort Research Summary Assignment Law Other (Not Listed)...1 page/≈275 words| 1 Source | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |