Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeOther (Not Listed)Law
1 page/≈275 words
1 Source
Other (Not Listed)
English (U.S.)
MS Word
Total cost:
$ 4.86

Unintentional Tort Research Summary Assignment (Other (Not Listed) Sample)

Unintentional Tort Research Assignment Cases of negligence, or unintentional torts, are quite common. These cases can be what many of us would consider minimal; however, these cases can also be quite serious involving serious injury or even death. Introduction Using the search engine of your choice, find a court case in your region that makes a ruling in regard to negligence or unintentional torts. Provide a link to the article, video, or website The case must be from within the last 10 years The case must make a ruling in regard to negligence or unintentional torts Write a SHORT SUMMARY that contains the following: What is the date of the case? Who was the plaintiff? What is their complaint? Who was the defendant? What was the court’s verdict in the case? What was the court’s reasoning in the verdict? Does the verdict offer reasoning? Do you agree with the court in this case? Why or why not? Submit your document for a grade. Creation: Your summary should be 200 - 300 words in length On a separate reference page, provide a properly APA formatted reference to the court case. In-text citations are not necessary for this assignment. You can find guidelines on citing/referencing court cases in APA All the information were to be written based on the attached files source..
Case Summary Student’s First Name, Middle Initial(s), Last Name Institutional Affiliation Course Number and Name Instructor’s Name and Title Assignment Due Date Case Summary The case I choose here is “Unintentional Tort Case: Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. Devries” available in the link The case was granted on May 14th, 2018, argued on October 10th, 2018, and decided on March 19th, 2019. The plaintiff was Roberta Devries, administratrix of the estate of John Devries. The complaint was that the widows of two US Navy sailors, Roberta G. Devries and Shirley McAfee claim that they developed cancer after being exposed to asbestos while working on Navy ships and in a naval shipyard. They sued a number of suspects, including who made the product and sent without any asbestos-containing insulation. The plaintiffs filed case in state court, claiming carelessness and strict liability. The defendant manufacturers filed a motion for summary judgment based on the bare metal defense, claiming they could not be held accountable for the sailors' injuries because their products were transported in bare metal form. Both the negligence and strict responsibility allegations were given summary judgment by the district court. The plaintiffs appealed, and the Third Circuit remanded, instructing the district court to address the plaintiffs' negligence claims more clearly, as well as explain whether it was applying the bright-line rule rather than the fact-specific rule that can be relevant to the bare metal defense, and which circuits are split. However, the plaintiffs filed another appeal, but the Third Circuit dismissed their strict responsibility arguments since they had been abandoned. As a result, it upheld the district court's decision in favor of the defendants' summary judgment on strict responsibility. The Third Circuit overturned the summary judgment on the negligence claim, saying that maritime law principles allow a bare-metal product manufacturer to be held accountable for asbestos-related injuries that are reasonably foreseeable due to the manufacturer's acts. In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court used the fact-specific test of the bare metal defense instead of the bright-line rule. The defendant was the Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al. On the other hand, the defendant was Roberta G. Devries, Administratrix of the estate of John DeVries, ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

    Description: CMRJ 500 FINAL QUESTIONS Law Other (Not Listed)...
    3 pages/≈825 words| 5 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
  • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Description: There would be no need for Procedural Protections if there was no Government acting in bad faith against citizens. If the Due Process of Law exists to avoid the government from abusing the governed, this means the government's nature is implicitly coercive. (Roach 6). The state must give you competent...
    1 page/≈275 words| 2 Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
  • What The Contract Law Says When It Comes to Performing Business Transactions
    Description: This critical thinking paper will mostly consider what the contract law says when it comes to performing business transactions between two parties and how the contract law differs from the business law. The paper will also try to look into the business law, how it differs from the contract law, the elements...
    3 pages/≈825 words| No Sources | APA | Law | Other (Not Listed) |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!