Decisions & Impacts of Key Government Leaders during New Deal Policies (Research Paper Sample)

Evaluating Decisions and Impacts of Key Government Leaders During:
The New Deal Policies, Eisenhower’s Emphasis on A Balanced Budget, And the Final Undermining of The Gold Standard
Student’s name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
Decisions and impacts of key government leaders during the New Deal policies
The word New Deal comes from Franklin Roosevelt's 1932 speech welcoming the Democratic Party's candidacy for the presidency. Although Roosevelt did not have existing policy suggestions in mind in the first place, the word "New Deal" came to incorporate his many measures intended to help the United States recover from the Countless Despair. The New Deal provided a slew of central administration services aimed at helping the needy, controlling business, and stimulating the economy. The “Three Rs” are a common way to summarize the New Deal: unemployment relief, economic growth(recovery) through government investment and job formation, and capital reform through administration agendas, and the development of new social assistance services.[Cowie, Jefferson. The Great Exception: The New Deal and the Limits of American Politics. Vol. 120. Princeton University Press, 2017.] [Patel, Kiran Klaus. The New Deal: a global history. Vol. 21. Princeton University Press, 2017.]
Roosevelt's New Deal significantly augmented the scale and reach of the federal government, drastically reshaping American political discourse on the impression that the government is responsible for its citizen's wellbeing. "Before the 1930s, national political discourse mostly spun around the issue of whether the national administration should interfere in the economy," as one historian put it. Following the New Deal, there was a lot of discussion about how the government could interfere.[Patel, The New Deal, 124.] [Cowie, The Great Exception, 132.]
Impacts
The First 100 Days
When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he immediately set about enacting measures that he believed would alleviate the economy and bring employment and economic relief to the people of America. He signed several new laws into law within his first hundred days in office, including the Homeowners Loan and the Glass-Steagall Act. He has put in place programs like the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Federal Emergency Relief Act (FERA) to create jobs (CCC). On the other hand, the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) was the most significant form of policy (NIRA). Roosevelt argued that financial growth required collaboration over opposition, so the NIRA was deliberately intended to limit rivalry while encouraging both wages and prices to upsurge. The act permitted corporations to form cartels on the condition that they upsurge wages and encourage workers to have labor contracts. The NIRA remained in force until 1935 when it was declared invalid by the Supreme Court.[Caughey, Devin, Michael C. Dougal, and Eric Schickler. "Policy and Performance in the New Deal Realignment: Evidence from old data and new methods." The Journal of Politics 82, no. 2 (2020): 494-508.] [Bernstein, Irving. The New Deal collective bargaining policy. University of California Press, 2020.] [Caughey et al., Policy and Performance in the New Deal Realignment, 500.]
The Second New Deal
The NIRA was overturned by the Supreme Court because it suspended antitrust rules and tied collusive conduct to the paying of higher salaries. Roosevelt, who strongly opposed the new ruling, was able to have the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) approved in 1935, which re-instituted trust laws while also strengthening a variety of labor protections. The proposed competition rules were generally rejected by the government.[Bernstein, The New Deal collective bargaining policy, 267.]
Under the NLRA, employees have much greater influence to participate in cooperative brokering and demand better incomes than they did under the NIRA. Corporations cannot retaliate against workers regardless on their collective bargaining under the current legislation, which also requires them to uphold the rights of both state and corporate jobs. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was created to carry out the NLRA in its entirety. After the NLRA's passage, union attendance improved from about thirteen percent of workers in 1935 to around twenty percent in 1939. The NIRA and NLRA did much to boost the purchasing influence of the ordinary employee, which, along with a series of duty rate rises on top earners, aided in decreasing income inequalities, but they struggled to lift the US economy out of its slump.[Brinkley, Alan. "4 The New Deal and the Idea of the State." In The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930-1980, pp. 85-121. Princeton University Press, 2020.] [Mastini, Riccardo, Giorgos Kallis, and Jason Hickel. "A Green New Deal without growth?." Ecological Economics 179 (2021): 10-32.]
A Weak Repossession
The unemployment remained at seventeen percent in 1939, and it did not fall below post levels until 1943. The internationalist policies of the President franklin D. Roosevelt, according to some observers, are to blame for the recovery's slowness. According to Brinkley, anti-competitive regulations linking collusive practices to higher wage payments rendered the recovery much more difficult than it should have been. Because of union workers employers' rising political clout and the high wages that come with it, inflation among them has stayed high. Finally, Caughey et al. contended that the repeal of these anti-competitive measures corresponds to the successful fiscal growth of the 1940s.[Brinkley, The New Deal and the Idea of the State, 127.] [Caughey et al., Policy and Performance in the New Deal Realignment, 507.]
Economic Stimulus
According to Fishback, while the financial system did recover heavily in the 1940s, some argue that this was due to a significant improved economy carried on by augmented government spending for the military effort. According to this more Keynesian standpoint, Roosevelt's strategies were far too imperfect to accomplish a budgetary monetary expansion. It is a mutual myth that the New Deal was a period of massive financial growth. Since several New Dealers were monetarily cautious, the welfare facilities they enacted were convoyed by considerable tax hikes. They argued that debt-financed borrowing, such as that advocated by British economist John Maynard Keynes, was more of a threat to the economy than an incentive.[Fishback, Price V. "New Deal." In Banking Crises, pp. 241-250. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2016.] [Bernstein, The New Deal collective bargaining policy, 201.]
Roosevelt focused more on social security problems, according to Philip Harvey, than with bringing together a Neoclassical economic stimulus package.  Roosevelt described the task he faced in 1932 as "the abstemious, less melodramatic business of managing capital and plants still in hand and sharing money and items more evenly," rather than "discovery or resource exploitation, or producing more commodities." The main problem was not higher economic growth and demand, which, along with economic liberalism, ensured that any rise in social investment would be much too limited to jump-start a floundering economy. According to this viewpoint, additional investment from the war exertion would be required to give the economy a much-needed improvement.[Caughey et al., Policy and Performance in the New Deal Realignment, 508.]
Roosevelt's New Deal reforms helped to reduce pay gaps in the U.S dramatically. In terms of reviving a slumping economy, on the other hand, the New Deal, were normally viewed as a failure. Most of those New Deal programs, such as Social Security, agricultural subsidies, and redundancy insurance, are still in effect today, despite debate about whether they were unnecessary or inadequate. For anything, the New Deal's legacy is that it aided in the development of greater prosperity and healthcare in America.
Decisions and impacts of key government leaders during the final undermining of the Gold Standard
Since the 1830s, the U.S. has been on a de jure and de facto gold standard. The Federal Reserve adopted the gold standard in 1913. The legislation allowed the Federal Reserve to keep gold at a constant value of 20.67 dollars each jot of pure gold equivalent to forty percent of the amount of the currency is sold. Despite the decades that have passed, the strength and severity of the controversy that began under Franklin Delano Roosevelt's presidency and his New Deal administration have remained relatively unchanged. And, although the number of historians who continue to condemn FDR as a demagogue and megalomaniac has shrunk as much as the number of those who consider him as Saint George who eventually slew the dragon of economic royalism has shrunk, the debate over such questions as: How new, in reality, was the New Deal continues to rage. What options, if any, were open to the country's top policymakers? In the end, was President Roosevelt effective in disciplining, liberalizing, and humanizing capitalism? Finally, what has been the long-term impact of Roosevelt's policies and services on the development of modern America?[Lubienski, Christopher, and T. Jameson Brewer. "An analysis of voucher advocacy: Taking a closer look at the uses and limitations of “gold standard” research." Peabody Journal of Education 91, no. 4 (2016): 455-472.] [Gowa, Joanne. Closing the gold window: Domestic politics and the end of Bretton Woods. Cornell University Press, 2019.]
In most cases, the Federal Reserve owned more gold than it needed to...