Gilman's View on Sexuo-economic Relations (Research Paper Sample)

Student's Name Professor's Name Course Title Date Gilman's View on Sexuo-economic Relations In her book Women and Economics, Charlotte Perkins Gilman describes the 'sexuo-economic relation' as the opposite of a healthy economic relation. She considers this relationship an essential factor in the evolution of the human species(Lundberg et al. 8). In the human species, the sexuo-economic connection impeded the development of female members of the human race due to their immature moral and intellectual development while promoting sexual development in both sexes. Although there was once an advantage to society by establishing sexuo-economic relations, it is obsolete now. The unnaturally maintained sexuo-economic association is the overall economic dependence of women upon men. It is caused by excessive individualism, the sexualization of industrial relations, and commercializing sexual relations. The societal implications of Gilman's view are profound, and further research into the consequences particular to our race is crucial, given how crucial the economy is in the evolution of the species and how peculiar the financial connection is in the human species. People may anticipate peculiar occurrences in human sexual relationships and economic concerns phenomena that are not directly related to human supremacy. Instead, they directly harm phenomena so pronounced and morbid that their origins are the subject of much debate. (Del Boca et al. 1007). Are these natural inferences fulfilled? Are these peculiarities in sex relations and economic concerns manifested in human life? The human mind has been preoccupied with finding an explanation for them since their inception since these are unquestionably apparent, conspicuous, and imperiously demanding attention. Therefore, this paper expounds on Gilman's view on sexuo-economic relations based on specific cases. Further expounds on their causes and effects on the affected individuals and society. As a result, being a boy or a girl and having to perceive everything from a different perspective is one of the things people try to instil in a child's developing mind. They must dress differently so that neither themselves nor anyone observing them can forget the difference between the sexes for even a moment. This is not because of their requirements, which are precisely similar now. The individual is nonetheless inevitably changed by their means of subsistence, notwithstanding all the influences of his later and more extensive life and all the reactionary consequences of societal structures. With us, the actual sex lives in a relation of economic dependence upon the other sex, and the financial relationship is combined with the sex relation. In the spawning season, the male assists the female in feeding the young and partly provides for her. With certain higher carnivores, the male assists the female in feeding the young. Just in the case of the hornbill, does the female rely solely on the male, even during this time of year; the male seals the female into the nest cavity with clay, leaving only her beak exposed, and then feeds her while the eggs develop. However, the female hornbill anticipates being given at any other time. This is an example that Gilman uses to argue that women are economically independent and do not need to rely on men(Raber et al. 121). Economically speaking, the female ant and bee are independent of the male. The employees, exclusively focused on economic tasks, are also women. With the carnivore, if the young lose one parent, it might be far better to be the father; the mother is reasonably competent to care for them. In the case of several species, such as the ordinary cat, the female must provide for herself and her offspring and protect them from the male. The male never provides the female lifelong support(Raber et al. 121). The global labor force and free exchange determine the economic standing of any race at any one time, with its attendant impact on all of the constituent individuals. Economic progress, however, is almost exclusively masculine. Such financial processes as women have been allowed to exercise are of the earliest and most primitive kind. Were men to perform no financial services save such as are still performed by women, our economic and racial status would be reduced to the most painful limitations. Gilman believed that a distinction should be made between "the fittest" and "the best" and between the social and cosmic processes(Raber et al. 124). The fittest should never be relatively identified with the physically strongest, while social processes amenable to direction by the telic application of human intelligence, therefore, to some degree distinct from cosmic processes. Drawing from conflicting signals from her mother, Mary Perkins, Charlotte knew that women could achieve a modicum of independence, but always at a price. In trying to express the excessive and unnatural sex distinction that leads to the sense of freedom, she implies that denied experiences of warmth in childhood, they were encouraged to control their feelings and give the impression of strength and self-sufficiency. Mary Perkins was a divorced and eventually self-supporting woman, nourished and sustained by a female network of friends and relatives; her nonconformity strengthened Charlotte's capacity for independence. Charlotte Gilman's economic struggles as a separated and subsequently divorced woman, and earlier the child of a divorced woman, made her especially sensitive to women's financial plight. She knew from experience that economic security in the home was a mirage. If deprived of the support of a male protector, women would invariably confront minimal work opportunities and often tragic impoverishment (Payne et al. 68). Yet she understood that the family, essentially as a social and economic institution, perpetuated female enslavement and denied women the opportunity for financial independence. For Charlotte Gilman, women's fundamental goal was building an economic power base. Gilman researched the societal, political, and institutional elements that foster and sustain gender inequity(Payne et al. 70). Gilman aimed to demonstrate that the conventional family's system of labor (breadwinner husband and homemaker wif...