6 pages/≈1650 words
How Prosecutor shape justice (Term Paper Sample)
To analyze how the prosecutor decision in any case determined the course of justice. source..
The parties involved and the criminal justice pre-trial procedure Name: Institution: Date: Introduction Any criminal justice system comprises of a series of processes before it's subjected to a full trial. This include investigations and arrest by the police, the charging and plea bargaining procedure by the prosecutor and the indictment by the grand juries (Worrall, 2007). In this respect the prosecutor is the only player who is entrusted by the government to ensure that law is enforced and justice is administered (Siege, 2012). The prosecutor has at his/her disposal heightened authority to determine whether the charged criminal face a full trial or not. To add to this, he/she is also mandated to carry out a plea bargaining process which determines the path a case follows. He/she does this through the immense uncontrolled powers bestowed upon him/her especially the power of discretion which he/she exercises to his/her will (Davis, (2001). These raise the question of credibility for a criminal case. Can justice really prevail if the prosecutor is influenced by other factors like political, personal or otherwise when deciding whether to charge or not? The responsibilities of the prosecutor in the criminal justice process The core role of a prosecutor is to decide whether or not to prosecute the criminal and also to file charges. The prosecutorial discretion allows him/her to decide solely based on the evidence presented to him by the police. Indeed he is the anchor of the entire criminal â€˜ship'. To start with, the prosecutor has two special responsibilities bestowed by the state which include the charging decision power and the plea bargaining powers (Worrall, 2007). As a result of these responsibilities he relies on evidence and information given by the police to decide whether to prosecute the accused or not as long as long as he/she feels that there is substantial evidence to prove that the defendant committed a crime (Siegel, 2007). Subsequently upon filing charges, the prosecutor uses at his/her disposal the plea bargaining powers to reduce or drop some charges, lessen some sentences of the charges in the exchange of pleading guilty offer of not contesting on the side of the defendant, in addition the prosecutor determines which charges to file, whether to drop the case or not and the punishment for those charges according to the law (Siegel, 2012). It is at this stage that the prosecutor again solely decides to engage a defense attorney with the hope of reaching the above charge agreements that prevents a full trial of the case to occur. This means that the prosecutor along with the defense lawyer can easily dispose a case if they reach a workable agreement, a move which can be de...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
- Principles of Restorative System and the Issues Arising from Crimes Against HumanityDescription: Identifying and discussing principles of restorative justice and the issues arising from crimes against humanity...7 pages/≈1925 words| 8 Sources | APA | Law | Term Paper |
- How Prosecutor shape justiceDescription: How Prosecutor shape justice Law Term Paper...6 pages/≈1650 words| APA | Law | Term Paper |
- Writing Assignment: Term Paper On The Voluntary ActDescription: Criminal offense may take the form of affirmative defense, as murder crime or even fault-based defenses such as withholding of essential information from police...3 pages/≈825 words| 3 Sources | APA | Law | Term Paper |