Philosophical Approaches to Race and Diversity (Term Paper Sample)

Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date Philosophical Approaches to Race and Diversity Society entirely depends on good relationships that people build to rise in all its institutions that people of different background share and interact with. Other languages, colors, and even religions automatically give people varied identities that make them unique. Diversity is a strength but not a reason for the division, for it is through it that people can share exciting cultures and practices to learn and adopt. Society has equally changed over time and grown in terms of institutions and the levels of leadership from the past decades to the present, thus marking a difference from the former. History discusses a society that was unfair and biased based on the color of its people. The biased nature of society was identified in the shared social amenities, income inequality, and leadership status, among other factors of survival in society. The paper addresses the presence of racism in society by comparing different philosophical approaches from Daniel Tatum and Garcia on how they view the issue of race and diversity. The latter is pretty different but not yet celebrating equality in some aspects, such as income inequality. Still, for gender equality, the people have leveled and understood their rights as indicated in the constitution. Racism is a long-serving historical trend as the former structures in society were racially divided, and color defined one's abilities without an actual assessment or measure (Garcia 23). The rise of philosophical arguments, all airing different ideas from personal perspectives, has educated society on what is good and what they should prefer to create unity. The independent thinkers have a very different approach to the topic since they feel the impact of racism on our society and to what level the effect of the same has affected the people. Development is the greatest challenge in any organization because people are divided. Thus, the essence of most works of literature is to identify its people's weaknesses and afflictions for the importance of educating and warning as they anticipate a change that is always inevitable for the greater good. The approach of Garcia in comparison to Tatum's thinking may be different. Still, they all drive toward the same idea, and they anticipate acquiring the same goal from our society which is to call for an equal organization that accommodates every member despite the color or background they were brought up. Garcia chooses to address the racism issue from two perspectives. He starts by dividing it from personal and institutional levels to get a clear view of how it afflicts society and what drives the spread of this racism in such a cancerous manner (Garcia 13). Garcia's most significant argument is presented as a complaint against people who want to hear and talk about racism. However, they are unwilling to educate others about what racism is and who is not racist in a society where stereotypes against each other are dominant. He addresses racism as a moral evil that afflicts people at their roots, and they grow with it and later reflect it to the social world. A moral evil affects the behavior or character of an individual; thus, Garcia considers this a factor that causes everyday moral decadence in a sane society. His approach to race is that the word race may be illusional or does not exist, but the word racism may be more real among people than they can imagine. The light view of Garcia is that racism is similar to animosity as it has been among other intergroup, and he considers that as reason emerging from the heart. The issue of race should be addressed from the heart because hatred is not physical but established in our hearts and what we believe. "How can one tolerate those he wants to injure and why ought one trouble oneself to tolerate those he disregards" (Garcia 5). The essence of this thought is to prove that racial hatred emerges within an individual and slowly takes over societal institutions. Through his eyes, we can understand the basic tenets of racism and the limits people should practice. Garcia points out how people become racist and shows that they are racist because their heart desires, plans, and aims are racist, as he views it to originate from a personal level. Giving an example of the nature of the society where the white race is considered superior, and the Black people are the inferior members of society, this notion impacts how relationships are in the social world. The hostility that is exerted on the Black population is either meant to benefit the Whites or cause them to incur expenses that they do not anticipate. Garcia blames the presence of a racist society on the people who show it personally, thus afflicting the shared structures in a unified society. Daniel Tatum does not address the aspect of racism and diversity at a personal level. Instead, he reflects on the existing relationships in society that together portray the existence of racism as history portrays. Some of the addressed racial aspects in Tatum's writing include labeling the society members. Tatum is not in agreement with a society with an inferior or minority as a name, as he terms that as a cause of division. The dominant culture in the society is meant to take advantage of others by oppressing them or seeing them as lesser beings, something Tatum calls for unlearning racism. In addressing relationships and how they are built in a developing society, Tatum shows that love is the root of them all. He further discredits love as he claims it is not enough as it alone can not result in an equal, authenticity, or mutuality in society (Tatum). The guarantee of these aspects is ensuring that the society is not only induced to love each other but also teaches its members to unlearn what they know about other races since it is through that they learn the truth about other races. Most people grow up being fed with distorted and corrupted information and image about other races, thus creating an internal barrier to associating with them. Tatum encourages the learning of races through experiences and relationships within the social setting. People should no longer depend on what they were taught but on the relationships they build across races in schools and other social settings. Through these first-hand experiences, they understand people more and eliminate long-lasting tenets of hatred they acquired during growth. They understand that it is not in their space to hate other religions and cultural practices but instead learn and adopt what they deem fit as they share some of their own. Tatum sees race as an inevitable topic, even among friends, as he gives an example of a family that heard children make racist statements that they considered having been learned through the parents and the notions that the children have acquired around social media platforms. Reflecting on media platforms, Tatum shows strong abhorrence for the platforms that have crafted specific ways of identifying the racial differences in society, thus influencing the spreading of hate of children in the future. Some children believe Black societies are violent by nature or stupid because that is what the platforms have taught the children without giving them a real chance to experience what a diverse society has to offer. Race influences how we view the world and interact with people (Tatum). Without visiting other societies apart from ours, it is hard to understand what people mean by social inequalities, unfair treatment, or the meaning of a racist society. An example in Tatum's writing is a general notion that Blacks believe that work should be enjoyed, as Whites...