Educational Leadership: The Statement Of The Problem (Dissertation Sample)

Educational Leadership
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
The Statement of the Problem and Sub problem
In a research titled, “Rethinking Juvenile Detention in Ohio”, which was carried out by the Children’s Defense Fund (2010) indicated that “an average of 26,000 children across the nation are put in confinement centers institutions on a daily basis” (p. 2).the young Learners devoted to juvenile incarceration and youth community centers are trained in an alternative educational environment rather than the old school environment. The Alternative schools can offer a supportive environment that usually entails social assistance and academic aid, along with a sense of belonging, and a supportive relationship that continues beyond the social relationships in most traditional schools” (Policy Studies Associates, 1995, p. 1). According to Raywid (1994), alternative institutions are “build to counter a group that seems not to be optimally provided for by a normal program” and they “express varying levels of departure from regular school structure, programs, and environments” (p. 26). The support provided and dignity is critical in improving the academic standards of the detained juvenile. However, investigation which has been carried out by different professionals indicates that detained students do not get the same status of education in these alternative schools measured up to their companions who go to traditional schools (Costello, Hollifield, & Stinnette, 1996).
Generally when students are discharged from juvenile incarceration and youth development centers and re-join traditional schools, they run into numerous challenges. Some of the difficulties are the lack of coordination between schools, the justice system, and the family setting. Additionally, the unfamiliarity with the educational material provided by the school can create difficulties for the student in regards to achieving their academic work and ultimately completing high school. These youth are classified as ones with higher chances of dropping out of high school because of these difficulties (Matvya, Lever, & Boyle, 2006). This is an indication that the changing process is critical to the juvenile’s academic achievement.
Before joining the correctional judicial system, a good number of adjudicated young people accumulate negative school events that consist of school drop outs, truancy, expulsion, suspension and other different types of academic underachievement. Wang, Blomberg, and Li (2005) related the academic failures of a statewide sample of delinquent learners and a matched case of non- delinquent students. Their discoveries showed that delinquent students scored low grade means, had lower school attendance records, and they were frequently being kept in the same grade, and were also getting more disciplinary actions in schools as compared to their non-delinquent peers. Correspondingly, in a wide survey of the educational qualifications of delinquent youth, Foley (2001) discovered that learners in correctional juvenile justice systems were characterized by a poor to medium scale of mental functioning, fifth- to ninth-grade educational performance, considerable delays in learning, language, math and class failure.
Both Professionals and researchers have frequently mentioned the necessity for efficient instructional exercises that focus on academic deficiencies and enhance educational results for learners in juvenile disciplinary institutions. In a survey of educators in juvenile schools in Louisiana, Houchins, Puckett-Patterson, Crosby, Shippen, and Jolivette (2009) found that educational-related matters (e.g., unreliable curriculum that is inadequate to meet the requirements of the students, a lack of learner capacity or ambition to join in prescribed tasks) were regarded as a major obstacle to granting juvenile proper education.
Educators in these contexts also noted that the heterogeneity of their classes had a bad effect on achieving instructional objects. The absence of stress on adequate instructional exercises in juvenile correctional institutions remains in conflict to broader learning and special education improvements of recent years, which emphasize that all youth and children have been given power by constitution to have access an education that is relevantly tailored to satisfy any disability-connected requirements they may have (IDEA, 2004; Leone, Meisel, & Drakeford, 2002; No Child Left Behind [NCLB] Act, 2002). A result of this shortage is the increasing representation of court cases declaring that correctional institutions may not be serving adequate special education assistance: class-action lawsuit seeking increase educational services for youths who have been incarcerated filed in almost half of the states under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) and lives on to appear frequently. As of 2005, over forty class action litigations linked to defective special education services in juvenile and adult corrections had been recorded by the National Center on Education, Disability, and Juvenile Justice (EDJJ, 2010)
Institutions and their influence on how managerial work is carried out have been discussed from a collection of viewpoints, covering how institutions are established (Mac Guire, Hardy and Lawrence, 2004), and how they are transformed (Greenwood, Suddaby and Hinings, 2002). He suggests that one area which is less developed in understanding systems is the role of the leader.As much as there are many problems that are facing juvenile facilities in United States the other major difficulties which correctional juvenile system is undergoing right now is poor leadership and management and By getting institutional leadership back to the front line of institutional evaluation, we reason that institutional leadership might be the rapprochement between the first wave of institutional evaluation which were mostly concerned with a deterministic picture of institutionalized force and the calls for a more agentic representation of institutions . Recently, different authors have been calling for recognition of an average ground of institutionalized action; institutional action (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006). By institutional job, the major interest is how institutions keep up their position and authority in the face of their own systematized environment. We claim that the institutional role of a leader in protecting the validity of their organization's credentials prolonged attention. In his book Kraatz suggest that the “approach of institutional leadership would thus present to relate with the more contemporaneous view of institutional activity…(however) this correlation remains a latent and generally underdeveloped one (Kraatz, 2009: 59)
Many individuals in modern day are striving to figure out the concept and process of leadership. The notion of leadership is identical to establish the influence in an institution and manage the transition and system. There has been the tremendous amount of information lately about the institution leadership. Though, many individuals still fail to understand the idea of leadership. To study the idea of leadership, people are expected to do more than going through just some literature which are fantasizing about how great the rulers should be. School leaders consist of people, who are holding various positions in the school, who gives direction and exercise influence in place to attain the schools’ objectives (Leithwood& Riehl 2003).
Leadership may start at the top, but it requires support and intensification all the way down and across the organization. One of the most significant qualities of an effective leader is the capacity to recruit and motivate the organization staffs. Leaders must have a wide outlook and objectives so they can challenge their subordinates to think and operate in new ways. Institutions cannot be run by as strict command-and-control organizations. Top administrators must support their juniors to make correct judgments and support them to give information, opinions, and views to the administratorsGenerally, The school head or principal will be understood as the school leader. However, the school leader can be anybody in the school population who support and reinforce the aims of the school. The aim of leadership is the advancement of instructional experience and performance, regardless of position (Elmore 2000). There is the extraordinary stress toward the institution leaders because the student's futures depend their obligations to perform their powers of leadership. A Leader can indicate the distinction between being great and being good (Thomas & Cheese 2005). The school directors should know the learner's needs and give them the most desirable results. Purpose of the studyThere are various research surveys on learning disabilities, delinquency, and the relation between the two. Few studies, however, gives out deep knowledge on prevention methods that can be adapted to benefit LD youth dealing with the juvenile justice system. There is even less study on how to save young people from falling into the correctional juvenile justice before delinquency. One of the most significant problems in the area of learning disability as a correlate of delinquency is failure in understanding the features of the LD by the juvenile justice system.
But as much as we focus on Juvenile learning, the major interest of this research is based on leadership and to observe how institutional directors in juvenile correction facilities maintain the values which are vital in their organization to improve students’ performance and meet the institutions goals.
Research QuestionsThis study will tend to examine role of a leader in justice juvenile facilities and ho...