Birth Control Coverage Research Witing Assignment (Essay Sample)

Birth Control Coverage
The Hobby Lobby & Wheaton College
Name
School
The Hobby Lobby, Wheaton College ends Coverage amid fight against Birth Control mandate
Are these institutions behaving ethically?
Yes,
The Hobby Lobby and Wheaton are behaving ethically; they act and run their institutions according to the standard and rules for conducting religious and behavioral practices; and standards of profession. The Wheaton College serves many students; both undergraduate and graduate totaling to 700, this comprises about ¼ of the college students, to avoidance of complying with the affordable Care Acts- comparative rules. With consideration to Obamacare, controversial contraception mandate, the college’s body managed its strategy to stop provision of health insurance to all its students, indicating its firms stand. It was made clear to the student, that the stop of the health insurance to its more 3,000 graduate and undergraduate students, this has made them stop out their plans and purchases some weeks before birth control coverage ends (Bullough, 2001).
The Health Care Insurance for Faculty & Staff is not affected.
In the incorporation of the Affordable Care Act crucial debate element is the need to include the insurance plans that is involved in the coverage for the birth control. The institution together with many Christian nonprofits and other businesses in the US like Hobby Lobby; this posed a mandate to initiate the view that religious freedom was being abused. In the institution, it appears that it has been first to navigate its protracted battle on its campus. The vice president concerned for the student’s development; Paul Chelsen, outlined that he regretted the last moment decision and any risk and hardship it brings.
In reference to Devi (2013), he outlines the importance of what has brought them together; it’s all about health insurance; it more than student’s health insurance. In reference to Tribune’s record, Chelsen implies what breaks his heart is that real people; i.e. college students are affected by the decision made. When the institution wins the case; an implication in reference to the government will inform them on what has to be done and can’t be done which is potentially more relevant. The institution in the suburban Chicago outlines that there is need to halt the offering of health insurance plans to their undergraduate and graduate to avoid the provision of birth coverage that is outlined in the Affordable Care Act.
The student’s development vice president outlines the students have been hurt by the decision and he puts it clear that he regrets it. The officials at the west part of the west suburb, an evangelical institution noted a compromise dedication which would initiate the need to notification to the government about their religion’s objectives that may prompt the institutional insurance that will initiate coverage for every student. Placing that into action, which need to place the health care initiative, may enforce Wheaton to go against religious beliefs, a word from their officials (Haerens, 2012). He insists the quest of someone who orders someone to give out something for the sake of the beneficiaries of his plan, then they are utilizing his plan. In order for the US government to handle the case effectively, Mark Rienzi, the lawyer for Becket Fund Religion Liberty outlines it clearly that; it wasn’t enough that this carrier would initiate an emergency contraception which will definitely make it clear that the college never condoned the service.
The Institution Joins Lawsuit concerning Health Requirement
The moral analysis together with the Wheaton College have no feel to this case; the lawyer clearly states that; “It’s very reasonable not to have a feel this way. The US government insists on not creating new insurance policies, it’s now not riding insurance policies.” Whilst the Roman Catholic Church objects any form of contraception, the protestant churches and institution have no coverage of these several form of birth controls that involves the pills and sterilization procedures. For instance; intrauterine devices and the FDA approved morning after pills which prevent any fertilized egg from its attachment to the walls of the uterus which violate the Institution’s principles since these evangelical churches and institution to equate the processes of abortion.
Other religious schools and groups comply with the government compromising plans. Moreover, the Wheaton filed the federal lawsuit in the year 2012. From that moment, the college has postponed the complying with this case, with a temporary stay by the Court of law in the US. The lawyer outlined that the college was onto the verge of cancelling its insurance some years back before the state’s high court ruling in 2014. This injunction rose up the moment after the court’s justice ruled in the favor of Hobby Lobby that; any family owned corporation will never be forced to offer contraceptive coverage for their employees. In a recent US Circuit Court of Appeal made a decision to deny the Wheaton’s request for preliminary injunction when its lawsuit is pending; which hastened the Wheaton’s decision to drop the student’s health care coverage.
However, there is claim that the college has a wrong concept of telling out that it’s being forced to use healthy plans to cover any emergency contraceptive. Moreover, the high court judge outlines clearly that he doesn’t see any reason why the college doesn’t comply with these compromise plan when the case is forwarded to the court system. In his address to students, Chelsen comprehends the issues and explains that the Wheaton has to the consistent and that their students’ hardship is of a grea...