Analyze Techniques for Reading Response (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

The Longman Writer: Rhetoric, Reader, Research Guide, and Handbook:
Analyze Techniques for Reading Response
Whenever you create a written response to a reading, the techniques you use depend largely on the position you are taking relative to the reading. A response that is in agreement with a writer's position, for example, will employ a very different overall strategy than a response that disagrees with the writer. In both cases, the job of the reader is to critique the strength of the writer's argument.
In this Discussion, you analyze the techniques one writer uses to critique the argument of another.
To prepare for this Discussion:
•Review the following required resources in The Longman Writer: Rhetoric, Reader, Research Guide, and Handbook:
◦Chapter 18 selection, "How the Schools Shortchange Boys" by Gerry Garibaldi (pp. 441–445)
◦Chapter 18 selection, "A War Against Boys?" by Michael Kimmel (pp. 447–452)
◦Part VI, "A Concise Handbook"
◾"Verbs" (pp. 611–615)
◾"Pronouns" (pp. 615–622)
◾"Modifiers" (pp. 622–624)
•Review Chapters 6 and 7 in They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (pp. 78–101).
•What techniques can you use to anticipate the objections of skeptics to your writing? How can you persuade your audience to care about what you have to say?
•Reflect on how Kimmel critiques Garibaldi's argument. How does Kimmel argue his point?
•Think about how Kimmel shows what “they say" and what "I say." What techniques does he use to respond to the naysayer? How does he show how Garibaldi is right or wrong?

source..

Content:

Analyze Techniques for Reading Response
Studentâ€™s name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Date
There are numerous approaches and mechanisms that can be used by a writer to critique the work presented by another writer due to ideological differences or nay factors that are deemed necessary. Garibaldi is convinced that the feminist teaching approach utilized by teachers is killing the academic dreams of the male students. Kimmel on the other hand is convinced that the feminist approach has no link to the predicament of boys in both the high schools and colleges.
Kimmel utilizes the technique of focusing on the big picture to criticize the views presented by Garibaldi since they both tackle the plight of boys in the new â€˜feministâ€™ educational approach. He is quite categorical and specific when providing his critique where he argues that the number of both boys and girls attending and graduating from high school is increasing over the years (Nadell, 2010). H e further alleges that it is only that the girls are recording the highest percentage increases, which do not measure up to the total percentage between the two groups. He criticizes Garibaldiâ€™s notion that feminist approaches in school are killing the dreams of boys. He says, "It is not the school experience that â€˜feminizesâ€™ boys, but rather the ideology of traditional masculinity that keeps boys from wanting to succeed" (Anson & Schwegler, 2008) thus implying that boys have no excuse for failing to succeed academically like their female counterparts.
The other technique that Kimmel has used to criticize Garibaldiâ€™s ideas is striving to be coherent. He is determined to ensure that his criticism make sense in line with the actual state of affairs on the ground. He analyzes the performance and enrollment of both boys and girls in math and sciences where he observes that the number of boys is always bigger than that of girls. The only problem he identifies is that boys tend to overstay in such courses for ...

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

Analyze Techniques for Reading Response (Essay Sample)

Other Topics: