Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Literature Essay (Essay Sample)
The following files are comments on a previous paper. They give examples of what a good evaluation/explication is like and what to avoid.
This paper is a 5 page explication, and 5 page evaluation of arguments made in Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals starting from section 1.
The following numbered files attached contain further detail:
(1) is the schedule detailing which pages were read from the book. Please take quotes and citations from provided page numbers.
(2) are the reading notes that have been discussed in class. May be helpful when writing the paper.
(3) the instructions of how to write the paper:
there are two major parts in total that are detailed in this doc. The first is an explication of the arguments made, the second is an evaluation of said arguments. The evaluation may be about the strengths or weaknesses of each argument (refer to future files for how to write a good evaluation) Please refer to the 3rd doc for further detailed instructions on the Kant paper
Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Name
Institution
Explicate of the Account
Emanuel Kant’s account of morality can be understood by focusing on his principles of good will, duty, categorical and hypothetical imperatives, and autonomy. To understand Kant’s reasoning and explanations, it is vital to know the foundations and motivations of his arguments. Kant’s understanding of morality is founded on deductive reasoning. According to Kant, morality (what is right or wrong) is determined by reason as well as specific supreme principles. His focus on reason was in direct contrast to David Hume’s understanding and foundations of morality. Hume (Kant’s predecessor) argued that feelings of approval or disapproval when one contemplates an action, determined whether what one intended to do was virtuous or wrong. Hume argued that if the contemplated action was right, then one would feel happy, but the opposite was also true. Thus, according to Hume, the ability to do right or wrong was natural; in other words, it is inherent in human beings. One only needs to contemplate an action, then focus on the feelings to determine whether it is the right action or not.
Other Topics:
- Intelligence Policies and Legal Issues Literature & Language EssayDescription: The team development stage is necessary because of enhancing team cohesion, teamwork, establishing norms, managing conflicts, and ensuring that every member is focused on the project’s goals (Chan, Scott, & Chan, 2004). The first activity would be to encourage members to respect each’s other’s ...4 pages/≈1100 words| 4 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- How effective would a border wall be between Mexico and the US in stopping the smuggling of . . .Description: The construction of the Israel border wall led to a significant decrease in car theft between Israel and West Bank, but the criminal activities spilled over to other unprotected areas in Israel. ...20 pages/≈5500 words| 25 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Strategic Management Literature & Language Essay PaperDescription: Sneakers Inc. should seek to use direct exporting and business to business (B2B) strategies. The direct exporting helps a company to interact directly with customers. Direct selling can sometimes be challenging to new market entrants, explaining why the B2B selling strategy is also recommended...10 pages/≈2750 words| 4 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |