Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssayHealth, Medicine, Nursing
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Criminalization of Human Errors Hampers Aviation Safety (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

the sample is about ethical DILEMMA associated with voluntary euthanasia . the task was to read about a case study and write A summary of the impact on social values, morals, norms, and nursing practice. in addition, the paper required the student to interview about their worldview regarding the ethical DILEMMA. the final requirement was a resolution to the ethical DILEMMA

source..
Content:

Voluntary Euthanasia as an Ethical Dilemma
Institution
Name
Date
Voluntary Euthanasia refers to the practice of painlessly ending life of terminally ill patients (Stoffel, 2009). Proponents of assisted or voluntary euthanasia argue that it becomes agonizing and expensive to continue having patients on care life support while no meaningful gains are being made towards recovery. Dax Cowart and Terry Schiavo show two cases of ethical dilemma presented differently. After suffering severe burns in his body, Dax Cowart continually pleaded with his physician to let him die. At some point in the hospital, he refused to consent to disinfectant treatment and made his desire to die known. Cowart’s physician refused to end Cowart’s life (Burt, 1998). The medical practitioner's acted not only as a doctor but also a human being who upheld the sanctity of life. Had he given in to Cowarts demands, a lot would have changed.
Due to the physician’s decision not to end Cowart's life, moral values were upheld. Cowarts, later on, became healthy, graduated from law school, married and live happily with family (Burt, 1998). Ethically, the physician played a significant role in making a decision as a doctor and as a human being. He helped Cowart became who he is today. Whereas the story of Cowarts is positive and entrenches the role of upholding ethical, social and moral values and moral norms, the story of Terry Schiavo is different. The family felt she had the right to live while the doctor and the federal government decided to take her life thereby shattering the life of family members and friends. Assisted Euthanasia affects the society as a whole differently. Both cases allude to the fact that decision to live should be left with close family members and not medical practitioners. Cowart's mother wanted life for her son, and the physician upheld it, on the other hand, Terry Schiavo's mother also wanted life for the daughter, but the doctor refused, resulting in a broken family.
Euthanasia debate has been an emotive issue and is being viewed very differently by members of the public. Some people approve and support the application of euthanasia while others do not support it at all. One of the people who believe that euthanasia should not be administered is Michael. Michael is a devoted Christian, who believes in the sanctity of life. When interviewed, Michael said no human being reserves the morality to take another person's life irrespective of the reason. Michel claims that no situation can justify inducing death to a patient however how much pain the patient is in or how much they have consented. Michael draws his philosophy and inspiration from Christian teachings. He asserts that there is no place in the Bible where human being have been instructed or given the power to terminate life. In fact, he claims the Bible urges us to preserve life at whatsoever cost.
Meddling with human life according to Michael is interference with God’s creation so death should not be induced or voluntary. Michael further argues that terminally ill patients are not in the right state of mind to call for their euthanasia and that it is the duty of caregivers and family members to preserve the life of the patient through all available means. He also argues that the decision to end life has a wider societal repercussion and therefore must not be decided by patients themselves. Losing a loved one when you know the life could have been saved is traumatic and stressful. Loss of life affect those left behind through bitterness, guilt conscious, and other lifelong effects that affects both the living and future generation (Verbakel & Jaspers, 2010). Michael finishes the interview with a reference to the book of Genesis which states that man was created in the image of God and that image is holy and should be protected from harm to the very end.
In many situations, medical practitioners like nurses are presented with a medical dilemma involving the use of euthanasia. And it form one of the most prominent issues is decision-making process. Who...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!