Did The Manhattan Project Violate The Ethos of Science? (Essay Sample)

Did The Manhattan Project Violate The Ethos of Science?

Background Information on Manhattan Project
Manhattan Project was a project endorsed by the government of the U.S. in 1942-1945 to produce atomic bombs. American researchers who belonged to the fascist regime in Europe undertook the first steps in 1939 to structure a project to explore the newly identified fission procedure for military usage. The United States led the project with the support of Canada and the U.K. Leslie Groves, who belonged to the U.S. army as an engineer, was the director of the project. The Manhattan Project is a narrative of how several of the most outstanding prominent researchers of the decades collaborated with a different company, the army, and Americans operating at locations all over the country to translate original breakthroughs into a new weapon.
The project remained a secret until the bombing of two significant locations still experienced the bomb's negative consequences. After the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, American citizens were aware of a top-secret state execution that stretched across the country. The execution bomb had material properties, a payroll, and a labor force similar to the automotive sector. The majority of the American people were dismayed to discover that such an extensive, government-run, top-secret mission existed. One hundred and thirty thousand people were working on the project at its height, and when the war was over, it had racked up a total cost of $2.2 billion.
Introduction
The Manhattan Project was the crucial engineering and scientific achievement of the 20th century. To build the first two nuclear bombs, the Manhattan Project incorporated concepts and innovators from every branch of science and engineering. Modern science inflated at an accelerating rate to alarming levels, from analyzing nuclear physics and chemistry through the practical engineering and processing of uranium 235 and plutonium 239, and finally, the ultimate fabrication of the weapons. Communication between researchers’ minds was critical to the Manhattan Project's success as it acquired knowledge. The question mark from the remarkable feat of the scientists and engineers is what their making signified, the obliteration of hundreds of thousands of innocent souls.
However, this melancholy notion of achievement cannot take away from the Manhattan Project's remarkable efficiency and teamwork. The competence of scientific morality is affiliated with the systematical reconstruction of those accurate directions for exercise established by the understanding inherent in all fields of inquiry. With reverence to its topic matter, as well as the awareness of the scientific methods for its observation and description, and an admiration of the potential for action launched by scientific expertise. In this perspective, research ethics should be understood as a subdiscipline of moral philosophy corresponding to a sociocultural domain of action controlled by specific kinds of information. First and foremost, regarding the work at hand, issues of scientific ethics must deal with two overlapping but interconnected phenomenon regions.