Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssayManagement
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.04
Topic:

Project Factors (Essay Sample)

Instructions:
Instructions Projects are by definition temporary endeavors with a specific beginning and end. Projects may be terminated due to the successful completion of all project activities or may end prematurely due to a variety of reasons including irrelevance, technical obsolescence, lack of top management support, organizational changes, strategic priority shifts, or a catastrophic failure. Review Table 14.1, Project Factors to Review, which lists six categories of project factors that should be periodically reviewed to determine if significant changes have occurred that might indicate that a project is a candidate for early termination. Construct an APA-compliant essay of approximately 750 words (3 pages), excluding title page and references, that uses at least one of the six categories of project factors (static, task-team, sponsorship, economic, environmental, and user) as a foundation to describe a technical project (real or imagined) that may be a candidate for early termination due to project factors listed in the category description. In your essay include: · A brief summary of each of the six categories of project factors (static, task-team, sponsorship, economic, environmental, and user). · A brief summary of a technical project (real or imagined) of your choice. · A clear articulation of the specific circumstances that provide a basis for early project termination consideration in your choice of project. · Research-based conclusions explaining how using a structured approach to periodic project review for significant changes may benefit the organization. (Knowing about these changes may make it obvious that it is no longer in the organization’s best interests to pursue a particular project opportunity.) [MO 6.3, MO 6.4] Table 14.1 - Project Factors to Review (From Pinto, J.K. (2020). Project Management: Achieving competitive advantage (5th ed.). Pearson) 1. Static Factors a. Prior experience b. Company image c. Political forces d. High sunk costs e. Intermittent rewards f. Salvage and closing costs g. Benefits at end 2. Task-Team Factors a. Difficulty achieving technical performance b. Difficulty solving technological/manufacturing problems c. Time to completion lengthening d. Missing project time or performance milestones e. Lowered team innovativeness f. Loss of team or project manager enthusiasm 3. Sponsorship Factors a. Project less consistent with organizational goals b. Weaker linkage with other projects c. Lower impact on the company d. Less important to the firm e. Reduced problem or opportunity f. Less top management commitment to project g. Loss of project champion 4. Economic Factors a. Lower projected ROI, market share, or profit b. Higher cost to complete project c. Less capital availability d. Longer time to project returns e. Missing project cost milestones f. Reduced match of project financial scope to firm’s budget 5. Environmental Factors a. Better alternatives available b. Increased competition c. Less able to protect results d. Increased government restrictions 6. User Factors a. Market need obviated b. Market factors changed c. Reduced market receptiveness d. Decreased number of end-use alternatives e. Reduced likelihood of successful commercialization f. Less chance of extended or continuing success source..
Content:
Project Factors Student Name Institutional Affiliations Instructor Date Project Factors Introduction and Project factors Projects can be brought to premature termination for a variety of reasons, ranging from the natural expiration of a project to unexpected changes in the external environment. Premature termination of a project can be a result of an organizational change, budget constraints, or even a change in scope or objectives (Schmidt, 2021). Whatever the reason, premature termination can have a significant impact on a business. It can derail progress, disrupt workflow, and create financial losses. It is therefore important to understand why projects may be brought to premature termination, in order to develop strategies to ensure successful completion. According to Pinto (2020), there exist six categories of project factors which should be reviewed periodically in order to determine if there are any significant changes occurring that may warrant an early termination of the project. These six factors include: Static factors which are factors that are independent of the project and should be predetermined before the project begins such as budget, benefits, costs, intermittent rewards, political forces etc (Helmold, 2022). The second category is Task-Team Factors which are factors that relate to the characteristics of the project team, such as their experience level, communication dynamics, and technical skills etc. Thirdly there is the Sponsorship Factors which are factors that relate to the project's sponsor and stakeholders including the level of commitment, support, and participation of the sponsor and stakeholders. Fourthly, there are Economic Factors which entail the economic considerations that the project team must take into account, such as the cost of materials, labor, and other resources. The fifth category is the environmental Factors which are external environmental factors that may influence the project, such as political, legal, and regulatory changes (Pinto, 2020). Finally the User Factors are factors that relate to the end-users of the project, such as their technical proficiency, feedback, and expectations. The technical project and circumstances/factors leading to early termination The project I am going to discuss is an imagined one which involves the construction of a new bridge linking two small towns in rural New England. The project was originally planned to be completed in a year, but due to numerous economic and environmental factors, it has become a candidate for early termination. This project is considered a candidate of early termination following an inter-play of several project factors. The primary factor at play here is the economic factor which rounds up to the cost of the whole project. The bridge was initially estimated to cost around $20 million, but due to rising material and labor costs, the final cost of the project has ballooned to over $30 million. This increase in cost has put a strain on the budget of the local government, which is already strapped for cash due to the economic downturn. As a result, the local government has decided to terminate the project early before it can cause further financial strain. This adds up to the static factor of the sunken cost of close to the initial estimated budget of $20 million already incurred but cannot be recovered. In addition to the interplay of economic and static factors, there are also environmental factors at play causing a halt to the project. The bridge was to be constructed over a protected wetland, which is home to a variety of wildlife and plants. The construction of the bridge would have negatively impacted the wetland, and the local government decided it was best to terminate the project early so as not to cause further damage to the environment. Notwithstanding, the user factor also played a role in the early termination of the bridge project. After the initial plan for the bridge was unveiled, local residents began to voice their concerns about its design. They were concerned that the bridge would be too large and overpowering and they feared its failure and also that it would disrupt the natural beauty of the area. As a result, the local government decided to terminate the pr...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!