Marx's and Epicurus' Opposing Views on What Constitutes a Happy Existence (Essay Sample)

Non-materialistic versus materialistic
Students Name
Institutional Affiliation
“What is the picture of the 'point' of human life implicit in Marx's discussion of "alienation", and how does this picture contrast with the views of Epicurus? Explain which of the two views you find more plausible and why”
Introduction
The creationist movement has reignited a long-dormant conflict between science and religion. This new creationism aims to further the materialist worldview, which can be traced back to the Greek philosopher Epicurus and was powerfully exemplified in modern times by Darwin, Marx, and Freud, despite its seeming focus on Darwin's theory. Supporters of intelligent design may be seen as hostile to sociologists, theoretical physicists, and science. This essay compares and analyzes Marx's and Epicurus' opposing views on what constitutes a happy and entire existence. The goal is to determine which philosophy provides the most logical argument for what life's "worth" is. Marx focuses on worldly considerations, but Epicurus emphasizes pleasure, misery, and friendship. The essay will also analyze how Marx's findings connect to current issues.