Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
You are here: HomeEssayPsychology
5 pages/≈1375 words
5 Sources
English (U.S.)
MS Word
Total cost:
$ 21.6

The ethical debate of using animals in research Psychology Essay (Essay Sample)


The ethical debate: using animals in research
Project instructions:
Utilize the library to gather books and articles to provide varying viewpoints on the debate


The Ethical Debate on Using Animals in Research
The Ethical Debate of Using Animals in Research
Scientific research has been the biggest contributor to human growth. In the past several hundred years only, many discoveries have been done that have made humans to optimize their ability to treat and manage infections, live a better life, fight some of the challenges they face, and even satisfy their curiosity. The use of animals in scientific and other forms of research has been at the pinnacle of this advancement. While many people, especially in the present-day, consider the use of animals in scientific research as crude, unethical, and even evil, there are proponents of the debate who hold that the use of animals in research is inevitable if humans are to advance as a species. This paper takes a comprehensive analysis of both dimensions of the debate, and uses various moral ethical theories to further understand the subject.
Animal experiments are widely used in the development of various medicines and for evaluating the safety of given products. To check the efficacy of vaccines, for instance, testing them on animals and finding the reaction is often better than trying them directly on humans. The use of animals like mice and pigs which have near-similar genomic and even physiological conditions like humans has been a feature of modern medical practice. The first argument of this debate holds that it is morally unethical to cause pain, reduce the quality of life, or cause death to animals for the sake of humans. The other dimension does not view it as a problem, and holds that the benefits accrued from such processes far outweigh the risks.
One way to look at the debate is through the harm vs. benefit question. The proponents of the debate argue that as long as such experiments produce far greater benefits for humanity unlike the consequences, then it can be justified. Simply, it is not problematic to subject a few non-human animals to some pain when conducting the experiment, observe the reaction, make conclusions, and unleash the benefits to humans. This is the same way it has been done for many years.

Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Four stages of cruelty Psychology Essay Research Paper
    Description: The article Four Stages of Cruelty by William Hogarth describes Tom's cruel behaviour towards various victims. The narration of Tom's vicious deeds warns different viewers about the dangers of hurting both human beings and animals (Warren, 2010). Tom starts by torturing small animals for his amusement...
    1 page/≈275 words| 1 Source | APA | Psychology | Essay |
  • Causes of Teenage Suicide and the Effectiveness of Prevention Programs
    Description: Defects in molecular processes contribute to suicide ideation and attempt. Teenagers born with defects in specific biological factors are likely to have suicidal ideation. Changes in genes and other biomolecules influence the internal metabolic processes, which lead to increased risk of suicide in teenagers...
    2 pages/≈550 words| 7 Sources | APA | Psychology | Essay |
  • Hemophilia Psychology Essay Research Coursework Paper
    Description: The genetic or environmental factor discussed is traumatic brain injury. Traumatic brain injury is a sudden injury in the brain initiated by a blow or a joint to the head. These injuries can range from small or mild or concussions to severe brain damage. Primary injury is the one that occurs...
    5 pages/≈1375 words| 3 Sources | APA | Psychology | Essay |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!